Sunday’s Sermon Today: Dream Big

A disclaimer: if you’ll be at White Bank for worship on Sunday morning, June 30, stop reading! Otherwise, you may be bored… or more bored than normal!

My Biblical namesake was a real peach. “Jacob” is the translation of the Hebrew for “he who holds the heel” or “usurper.” Neither one is truly complimentary… but they’re pretty fierce! It’s funny how that whole name thing carries weight. In his book the Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell highlights how important a little thing like a name can be. He says if you grow up named Princess, you have certain obvious expectations about yourself, and if you grow up with the name like Bullwinkle, you have certain ideas about yourself. Of course, that doesn’t take into account all of those things like nature and nurture, but you get the idea. And in the case of Isaac’s son Jacob in Genesis 25 and following, it seems to do the trick. We’re going to explore the life and times of the trickster named Jacob, especially two encounters he has with God.

It’s important to see that before Jacob is even born, his mother Rebekah has trouble. She has two firebrand twins wrestling in her stomach, but the voice of God speaks to her in Genesis 25, with a message of comfort… and trouble. “Two nations are in your womb,
and two peoples from within you will be separated;
one people will be stronger than the other,
and the older will serve the younger.” So out pops Esau and then there’s Jacob holding onto Esau’s heel. Jacob becomes a stay-at-home guy while Esau goes hunting, but it says that his mother loved Jacob more.

You know how it goes when one child is loved more than the other. Some of you were the favorite, and some of you were… the other. But before too long, Esau comes home from hunting hungry, worn out from his occupation, to find that Jacob has dinner brewing over the fire. We don’t know if Jacob was lying in wait for Esau or if it was a matter of circumstance, but Esau sells his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of soup. For a bowl of soup, it says that he gave up his guarantee of inheritance!

I’ve done some foolish things, but really, that’s pretty bad.

Years later, in Genesis 27, the old, blind father Isaac calls Esau into his tent to give his final blessing because he’s dying. But Isaac tells Esau to go hunting for him; Rebekah overhears and helps her favorite, Jacob, dress in disguise and trick his father. When Isaac asks how he returned with cooked meat so fast, he tells his father that “The Lord your God gave me success.” We can see already that Jacob is one who is quick with an answer, and his desire to get ahead (or not get caught) means that he’ll even use God to get himself out of trouble! Of course, when Esau finds out, the friction causes Rebekah to send Jacob away to her brother Laban, where Isaac tells him to find a wife (a cousin).

And then Jacob meets God for the first time, in Genesis 28:10. I don’t know where you were when you met God for the first time. Maybe it was soon after you were born, or maybe you feel like you’ve come to White Bank and you’re experiencing God for the first time. For Jacob, he meets God while he’s on the run, fleeing his family to an unknown future. Jacob falls asleep on a rock pillow (seriously, how tired must he have been??) and he dreams of a stairway to heaven (queue: Led Zeppelin) with angels climbing and descending the stairway. And God speaks to Jacob in this dream and says, “I am the Lord, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac. I will give you and your descendants the land on which you are lying. Your descendants will be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east, to the north and to the south. All peoples on earth will be blessed through you and your offspring. I am with you and will watch over you wherever you go, and I will bring you back to this land. I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.”

Jacob wakes up with the sudden realization that he didn’t leave a place and leave the God of his father and his grandfather, of Abraham and Isaac, behind, but that God was with him. Up until that point, people had believed for generations that if you were in Colonial Heights, you worshipped one god, and if you were in Petersburg, you worshipped another. But here Jacob has experienced a God who is over everything, even Jacob’s future.

So Jacob made a vow, saying, “If God will be with me and will watch over me on this journey I am taking and will give me food to eat and clothes to wear so that I return safely to my father’s household, then the Lord will be my God 22 and this stone that I have set up as a pillar will be God’s house, and of all that you give me I will give you a tenth.” But in Genesis 29-30, it’s almost like Jacob forgets the vow or he at least doesn’t realize the importance of what he’s done. Which means that Jacob is in fact a lot like you and me: he doesn’t always understand what God really wants from him or know exactly how to respond. He doesn’t exactly know what it means to make “God my God” as he promised.

In the interlude, Jacob meets Rachel at a well and he works for his uncle Laban to win her as his wife. She’s the younger wife, so Laban tricks Jacob by sending in Leah (the older) on his wedding night. So he works 7 years for one and 7 years for the other. Between Rachel, Leah, and their maidservants, Jacob had 12 sons but they created more drama which we’ll get to next week. After his final son was born, Jacob asked Laban’s permission to go home, but Laban says he knows God has blessed Laban because of Jacob. Jacob asked for every speckled or spotted sheep of Laban’s, and then he received all of the livestock he could handle. Jacob is up to his old trickster tricks, getting by on a little luck and some Windex.

And then, because just when you get comfortable, God seems to tell you something that will challenge you and make you uncomfortable, to remind you that your life and “THE PLAN” are God’s and not yours, God tells Jacob that it’s time to return home, so they flee from Laban who pursues them. When they finally confront each other, Jacob says “If the God of my father, the God of Abraham and the Fear of Isaac, had not been with me, you would surely have sent me away empty-handed. But God has seen my hardship and the toil of my hands, and last night he rebuked you.”

Jacob is still claiming “divine right,” but he hasn’t really embraced God yet. He’s one of those people using God for what he wants rather than searching out what God wants. But in Genesis 32 it is time for Esau and Jacob to meet again.

The night before, Jacob sends his family and livestock ahead, prays to God. This is Jacob in the foxhole, the person praying desperately, under fire, for some miracle to work out where he doesn’t end up beaten or left for dead when his brother finally catches ahold of him. It’s the kind of prayer I usually prayed when I figured my sister was going to report what I’d done to my mom or dad; realistically, it still works that way with her! Genesis 32:9-12 Then Jacob prayed, “O God of my father Abraham, God of my father Isaac, Lord, you who said to me, ‘Go back to your country and your relatives, and I will make you prosper,’ I am unworthy of all the kindness and faithfulness you have shown your servant. I had only my staff when I crossed this Jordan, but now I have become two camps. Save me, I pray, from the hand of my brother Esau, for I am afraid he will come and attack me, and also the mothers with their children. But you have said, ‘I will surely make you prosper and will make your descendants like the sand of the sea, which cannot be counted.’”

Jacob just prayed the sinner’s prayer! He just repented of his bad attitude, of the way he’d “played” other people, and he cried out for God’s grace and mercy. He finally admitted that he had done things wrong, and he called on the promises of God to sustain him in the midst of his fear. But just because we repent, it doesn’t mean there aren’t consequences.

In Genesis 32:22-32, Jacob is fully awake this time and all by himself, about to cross back over the river into the land of his ancestors, and he wrestles a man ALL NIGHT LONG. It says that the man, either God or a representative of God, could not or would not overpower Jacob until he cheated—until he touched Jacob’s hip so that it wrenched. God/the angel did to Jacob what he had been doing for so long; he used the powers he had that were above and beyond where the lines had been drawn to achieve the outcome he wanted. But Jacob refused to let go. “I will not let you go unless you bless me.” So the man says, “you are no longer Jacob but Israel, or he who prevails with God, because you have struggled with God and with humans and have overcome.”

It’s almost anti-climactic that Jacob and Esau meet and that their interaction is so much more peaceful than Jacob could’ve imagined. It’s almost besides the point that for the rest of the Old and New Testament, that Yahweh God would be the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob. That God claimed Jacob in a dream on the way over the river, and Jacob claimed God on the way back.

Because Jacob wrestled with God, and he won. (Well, maybe he didn’t win, but he wrestled God to a tie!) Because Jacob dreamed a dream and refused to let go of it even when it was against his nature to hold onto it. Because the matter of nature versus nurture played out in a way that God valued Jacob both for who he was before he knew God and who he was after he knew God. Because God knew Jacob and loved him both before and after the river.

As we gather together today, I ask you, what river is it that you need to cross? What wrestling match with God lies before you? Do you know that God has loved you along but that God has a dream for your life that he wants you to know and understand, and that God patiently waits for you to catch up to that dream?

Today, I am the pastor of Blandford United Methodist Church, and for the first time, the pastor of the Stand Church, too. I’ve had a dream God has put on my heart to plant a church, to reach out to those who did not find a home in traditional church, to bridge the gap between meeting God for the first time and being accepted into church as a member of family. I’ve seen it work with Blandford and I’m watching it develop with the Stand. I don’t want us to make the mistake Jacob made, to not dream big enough—to think that God’s dream is just for a “little bit” here or there—to fail to see that God wants to use the church as a blessing for everyone. I want to dream big, to wrestle with God.

I don’t know how you got here, or even why you came, but for the next few hours, we get to celebrate as the varied, diverse forms of God’s church here in the world. We get to wrestle with each other, to wrestle with our natures and our nurture, to bask in the recognition that whoever you are, you are loved by God, and that God wants to know you right now. You are loved. God knows your name, and he wants you to be part of his family. God will give you a new name, a new dream, and a calling that will last your whole life.

Thanks be to God who meets us where we are but refuses to leave us there. Amen.

Posted in Sermons, Theology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Incredible Burt Wonderstone: Rediscover Joy

Two geeky kids, beaten up and left behind in the midst of middle school, find magic one day, and recognize that there’s more to life than being shoved in lockers and escaping swirlies. Thirty years later, Burt Wonderstone (Steve Carrell) and Anton Marvelton (Steve Buscemi) are a blockbuster act in Las Vegas, but the joy of magic has left Wonderstone and the “magical relationship” between the two is broken. When street performer Steve Gray (Jim Carey) of the television show Brain Rapist horns in on their action, the fraction breaks them apart and they must re-examine who they are supposed to be.

The film isn’t laugh outloud funny, but it has clever moments, and certainly includes a star-studded cast that rises above the goofiness you might expect from this magical spoof. James Gandolfini plays the overbearing casino owner who can’t remember how old his son is; Alan Arkin plays the Rance Holloway, the elder magician who taught Wonderstone via some ancient VHS magic tapes; and Olivia Wilde shines as Jane, the production assistant-turned-magician’s assistant who sees good in Wonderstone even at his darkest hours.

The main active storyline is old school illusionist Wonderstone versus new wave gross-out artist Gray. It’s obviously the battle between ideals but it’s also a look at what happens when a new way comes along and doesn’t appreciate the way that the old ways allowed the next generation to flourish. But that “old way” in Holloway establishes the main thesis of the moral/emotional storyline: the rediscovering of joy or faith in magic.

Wonderstone is going through the motions, collecting paychecks, getting women in bed, and making a jerk out of his fame. He’s horrible to Marvelton and to Jane, but it’s all about the fact that he’s forgotten who he was, the nerdy kid who found magic as an outlet. Rediscovering his joy in the mysterious and his faith in making people experience “wow,” Wonderstone recognizes who he’s supposed to be because he figures out who he was to begin with in middle school. It frees him to be the right person to Julia, to Marvelton, to the public who deserve better than Gray.

We’re often Wonderstone: we forget where we’ve come from, how we got here, who helped us get here, and who we’re meant to be. It takes an intervention of sorts, by another person or the gentle move of God in our lives. It takes a “repentance” from the way we’ve been before, and a desire to be better than we are. It takes forgiveness (which the trio of Wonderstone, Marvelton, and Julia experience), and it takes a recognition of the “magic” or spirit that moves in our world.

The Incredible Burt Wonderstone isn’t a great movie but it’s got some magical moments, some life lessons to teach us, and in the process, it may just wow you, too.

Posted in Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A New Season (Neighbors Fall 2013)

This devotion will show up in the Virginia Methodist devotion, Neighbors, this fall. But here it is now.

Fall is one of my favorite times of year. It brings football, colder weather, some family traditions, and usually the sort of kick-off events in ministry that draw in new people and opportunities. Because my life has been lived in “school years,” from my own experience as a student, then campus minister, and finally as a husband of a teacher and a parent, I find myself comforted by the “new start” that each fall brings. I like knowing that something new could happen, that my potential for these moments could be fulfilled.

In Nehemiah 1, the prophet has just received some bad news from his home city of Jerusalem. At this point, he’s just a cupbearer, not a prophet. But when he hears about the brokenness of his hometown, he prays a bold prayer to God, reminding God of his covenant with his people, and asking for grace and mercy. He confesses his sins and those of his people, and asks that God would grant him favor with the king. And out of that humble prayer, the walls of Jerusalem are rebuilt, and a prophet is born.

I wonder what bold prayers we should be praying as we head into fall. Are we needing a new, fresh start, or asking God to help us rebuild a formerly healthy thing that has broken down and is in need of repair? Do we need a God-sized pep talk like the halftime of a football game or do we need the gentle comfort that we are running the right way, and the hole will open up for us to explode into the end zone of this current situation?

One of my favorite halftime speeches comes from the film Friday Night Lights. Coach Gaines knows his players are up against it in their game against the bigger, badder opponents. But he stands before them and talks about perfection: “To me, being perfect is not about that scoreboard out there. It’s not about winning. It’s about you and your relationship to yourself and your family and your friends. Being perfect is about being able to look your friends in the eye and know that you didn’t let them down, because you told them the truth. And that truth is that you did everything that you could. There wasn’t one more thing that you could’ve done. Can you live in that moment, as best you can, with clear eyes and love in your heart? With joy in your heart?”

I pray that this Christmas, you’ll look back and recognized that you did everything that you could. That God used you, regardless of where you start this fall, to do everything possible for the kingdom of heaven. That you will have lived with joy in your heart. Pray boldly that God would use you to repair, restore, plant, create, and make new. Do it with all your heart; do it in the community of faith. Give it all of your attention, and know you are where you need to be. Because as they say, “Clear eyes, full hearts, can’t lose.”

Posted in Movie Reviews, Sports, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Man Of Steel: Epic Reboot (Part II) *Spoiler Version*

If you haven’t seen the movie, I recommend going here first. What follows is unabashedly for those who’ve seen the film already and contains spoilers. 

Man of Steel begs for this idea I read somewhere… that all stories boil down to being about fathers and sons. In this case, the story of a boy-turned-man trying to understand his fathers, one Kryptonian and one human, pulled my mind to the life of Jesus as the son of Joseph the carpenter. Did Jesus ever ask Joseph if he could just be himself? If Joseph would still be his “real” dad? Did Joseph ever warn Jesus that others weren’t “ready” for what Jesus had to say or do, and that they might not like it if he told them? (One certainly thinks that Jacob would’ve tried to warn Joseph in Genesis not to share his dreams with his brothers.)

Both fathers attempt to “help” Clark/Kal-El, and both of them sacrifice themselves for what they believe. In so many movies, the child-turned-hero is orphaned when their parent (mother or father) sacrifices themselves to protect the child. Crowe’s Jor-El literally fights to the death to protect his son’s spacecraft, but Costner’s Kent’s death is more multi-layered. We certainly get the impression that Clark could’ve saved him from the tornado, but he willingly died (saving a dog!) to keep his son’s secret safe. To allow Clark the opportunity to choose for himself when he would expose his secret to the world.

That morality choice is just the tip of the iceberg for what will follow. Antje Traue’s Kryptonian Faora tells Clark/Kal-El that he’s weaker because he’s moral, because he’s less evolved. She’s a representative of a culture that has taken choice/chance/free will out of the equation in their genesis chamber, and made it solely about doing what the society deemed appropriate and true. The Kryptonian society had basically taken emotion out of the equation in childbirth, but that hadn’t removed evil from the equation, had it?

Because Zod is obviously evil. Evil in terms of a good thing (protecting the Kryptonian race, i.e. doing his job) becoming a bad thing, a sin. Zod is evil because he moves from protection for good to destruction on behalf of revenge and self-service. What Faora and Zod deem evil because they can’t understand it actually gives Clark his strength, the desire for a united community, a humanity he can represent and be in relationship with, not just protect as his autonomous champion. (In fact, the film emphasizes it’s Clark plus humanity against the world, not Superman alone, with the efforts of Lane and Chris Meloni’s Colonel Hardy.)

But the most complicated issue happens in the director’s chair. Snyder struck me as a strange directorial choice for Man of Steel. Sure, he’d done superhero movies, but they were always anti-heroes, not actual good guys, right? And that concern, that reservation, proved accurate when Superman is forced to kill Zod to save the lives of a family. We’ve crossed a line that even Superman Vs. The Elite didn’t cross, and it strikes me that Snyder is daring us to consider whether or not we still see Superman as a Christ figure or not. But I’d argue he still is: by killing Zod, Clark sacrifices his own hopes and dreams of knowing Krypton and having Kryptonian community, doing so to save the lives of others. So, even in killing another, he sacrifices his own desires, wishes, and dreams on another’s behalf. Remember, we’re talking Christ figure here, not Jesus himself.

Sure, some people will see a Christian figure, even if this seems to trend toward the Judeo “uberman” that Joe Schuster and Jerry Siegel were aimed at, as they struggled with bad stuff happening to good people and their own experience with loss. But to see Man of Steel as a Christian movie, or specifically heavy-handed in its theology? You’ve lost me. I do see the 42 like examples of Clark’s refusing to fight (“I need a superhero with the guts not to” to butcher Branch Rickey) of Christian morality, but this is a story about family, about belonging, about trust.

Those are the main topics buried under CGI and superhero elements: community and trust. Similar to Superman for Tomorrow, Clark seeks out the advice/confession of a priest, who urges him to “take a leap of faith; the trust comes later.” Clark surrenders himself to the military to show good faith, then surrenders to Zod and finds himself the subject of detrimental tests. His faith in humanity is proven in its reciprocal response, while Zod has proved to be everything Clark feared he would be. To protect the community, Clark recognizes the trust he has in the humanity he knows, and values that over a hoped for community with Zod, who has been untrustworthy.

In the end, it seems to me that this could’ve been an epic, Shakespearean tale of belonging, with or without a red cape.

Posted in Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Man Of Steel: Epic Reboot (Part I)

My most anticipated film of the summer had arrived. After years of waiting for my favorite superhero from childhood to be “refinished,” for the sour taste of Superman Returns to be washed out of my mouth, I engaged Zach Snyder’s Man of Steel on the only day, in the only time slot, available for the first ten days of its release. But could Man of Steel do what no Warner Bros. hero movie (outside of the Christopher Nolan Dark Knight trilogy) has done, and actually measure up to the tentpoles of the Marvel universe?

To be fair, I’m segmenting this review in two parts. The first half will be spoiler free, and I’ll expect that if you read the second half, that you’ve either read the movie or you hate surprises altogether. But I’ve warned you.

Man of Steel begins with an extended explanation about how Kal-El/Clark (Henry Cavill) ends up on Earth. We literally begin at his childbirth, setting off a whole realm of Christological comparisons that force even the slightest amount of the life and times of Jesus Christ to seem blatantly obvious. Gone is Marlon Brando; in is Russell Crowe. While Brando’s Jor-El was a talking politico, Crowe’s swashbuckling scientist is a forward thinker unafraid to use his fists. But both fathers agree that they are sending Kal-El to Earth where he will be safe and became a rock star, er, godlike entity.

What’s different here is that we see the backstory of Michael Shannon’s General Zod. We’re never compassionate to Zod to the point of wishing he’d win, and the outcome keeps piling on why, but we see that he literally thinks it’s his job to protect Krypton from its destruction, even if the rulers of Krypton are the cause. He wants to save Krypton from itself, by controlling the genesis chamber’s codex, which is where all children (except Kal-El) have been born for thousands of years. But Jor-El is one step ahead of him, and we flash back and forth between different eras of Clark on Earth until Zod-on-Earth matches up with Clark-on-Earth time.

This is ultimately just as much about a sense of family, of community, of belonging, as it is of a man/alien becoming a savior. Sure, Clark is 33 years old when Zod arrives on Earth, the generally accepted year that Jesus was crucified, and there are lots of Christ images throughout. But Snyder’s focus seems to be on the way that Clark is a product of two cultures, of the nature of his Kryptonian parents and their mission for him as well as that of his Earth parents, especially Kevin Costner’s Jonathan Kent. Both sides want him to rise to the occasion (in Jor-El’s case, maybe even rule) and it’s a constant struggle for the coming-of-age superhero to establish who he is supposed to be and in what time.

We might even suppose that without Zod’s rude entrance, Clark’s timetable might never have accelerated to the point where he’s discovered by Lois Lane (Amy Adams) or shown off to the world, outside of a smattering of strange rescues he performs. We might see that Zod proves to be the “satan” tempting Christ in the desert, with choices about who he could be for himself and for his dreams of belonging and knowing Krypton, versus a sense of service and protection he feels toward Earth. But it still boils down to the question Clark asks over and over: can he trust humanity with who he is?

As a Superman fan (I’ll admit it, I loved Superman more than Batman… as a kid), I find myself asking if Snyder could be “trusted” with the franchise. Sure, he’s got 300 and Suckerpunch under his belt, but he’s got 300 and Suckerpunch under his belt! Neither one is screaming “pure, moralistic super hero,” are they? But that bleeds into my spoiler piece so that will have to wait.

Instead, I’ll say this: Man of Steel was a good start. To a trilogy. If that’s where it ends, I’ll be deeply dissatisfied. But given how “small” Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins started, and where it ended up, this seems set to launch Cavill and company into an orbit that could outshine them all. Maybe we’ll get less CGI the next time, with more of Clark’s Earth relationships, because really, that’s what this movie does best, surprisingly. That’s what makes us feel, and what makes us ask ourselves, “Could we risk it all for the good of the many?” That’s the question asked, and answered, by Superman… everyday.

Posted in Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Sermon Today: One Tribe

I’d recommend you read Genesis 12-19 and Hebrews 11 before reading this. And I’d recommend you not read it if you’ll be sitting in the Blandford UMC sanctuary on Sunday, June 16, because you’ll probably be bored during the sermon. But you don’t have to listen…

Since the dawn of time, humanity has been looking for a way to survive. For most people, that means teaming up with family or close friends, forming bonds that require individuals to rely on each other. From the very, beginning, those groups were called “tribes.” In their book Tribal Leadership, Dave Logan, John King, and Halee Fischer-Wright lay out five stages of “tribal development,” that Phil Jackson has used to examine the success and cohesiveness of his basketball teams. Having found success in with the Chicago Bulls and the Los Angeles Lakers, his use of the book’s characteristics carry some weight. Moving from least cohesive to most cohesive, they are as follows:

1-This is shared by most street gangs and is characterized by despair, hostility, and collective belief that “life sucks.”

2-This is a loose group of primarily apathetic people who perceive selves as victims and who are passively antagonistic, believing “my life sucks.”

3-This is a groups that focuses on individual achievement and is driven by the mindset that “I’m great and you’re not.” Individuals within the group have to win and winning brings personal core values. They either outwork or outthink their competition on regular basis but they are basically a collection of “lone warriors.”

4-This group is dedicated to tribal pride and the overriding conviction that “we’re great and they’re not.” It requires strong adversary from outside the group, and Jackson says that the bigger the foe more powerful the tribe

5-This group has achieved success as a tribe as they rally around their sense of innocent wonder and strong belief that “life is great.”

Stop for a moment and consider what groups you belong to, and where they might fall on a spectrum of tribal leadership. Are they 1s or 5s or somewhere in between? The truth is that all of them place value primarily on what the individual brings to the group, and what the group can do. There’s no reflection of accepting help or recognizing a “higher power.” It’s more of a study in personalities than a reflection on grace.

But today, as we examine the story of Abram, you will see that the tribe God calls Abram to be is a “5+” with the realization that God causes the wonder and makes all things good. In Genesis 12:1, God shows up and tells Abram, rather bluntly, to leave where he is, to turn his back on his family, and his ancestral land. It comes with the “carrot,” that God will make him into a great nation, will make Abram powerful and famous, and that he will BE a blessing. God basically tells Abram that he’s going to use Abram to have a powerful impact on the world IF Abram will be obedient to leave and go. God’s first big test for Abram is to leave what he knows, to put aside the comfort and security of the life he has lived, and to go on faith that God will take care of the rest.

So, at the ripe young age of seventy-five, Abram goes. And takes his wife, Sarai, and his nephew, and their entourage, and they begin their journey. It doesn’t take long (Chapter 13) before Lot and Abram split because Lot says there’s not enough space for all of their people. It’s like a RISK or Monopoly power play: he who controls the land, controls the power. And Lot doesn’t just want to follow Abram around: he wants a piece of it for himself. What God had intended for unity, for that ONE TRIBE, Lot couldn’t accept because he wanted more than his share.

Of course, Lot gets himself in trouble, several times really, and Abram rescues him. Sarai worries that her barrenness means that God’s plan needs some “help,” so she has Abram sleep with Hagar; Abram keeps asking God what he really means about a blessing. And then we get to chapter 17, and God lays it all out there. “I’m going to make you the father of many nations, to be fruitful” (echoing those words he spoke to Noah after the flood.) “I will be your God and your descendants’ God. You will no longer move from idol to idol when you move about, but will recognize that I am your God.”

God is presenting something countercultural and fantastic: that one God would be enough, would fulfill everything that a person or a tribe could ever need. “But this covenant is one we’re going to keep. I’m the higher power, and you’re the lesser. And the sign that you get this is circumcision.” Sounds painful, right? But the thing about the covenant was that God gave Abram and Sarai new names, Abraham and Sarah.

And God promises Abraham a son, because without a son, he can’t really be the father of a nation, or the beginning of a tribe. It spoke against his character within the tribe; it meant that he wasn’t on the same level with his people. But God is not done with Abraham, or Sarah, or even Lot. God’s desire for Abraham and Sarah brings them through some crazy situations, through Sodom and Gomorrah, through Abram faking that Sarai is his sister not his wife, through old age and childbirth. And the same Abraham who so compassionately pleads for his nephew and for the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, he gets tested by God at the very threat to the thing he loves the most: his one and only son.

This story from Genesis 22 still gives me chills. I remember the first time I ever preached on it. It was the spring of 2008, and our first son had just been born in March. I don’t know what caused me to preach on it, or why I thought it was a good idea at the time. But I set out to unpack the story of Abraham’s preparations to sacrifice Isaac. And I got so choked up I couldn’t talk.

Here’s Abraham, minding his own business, having been fully obedient to the words of God, and finally, after years of wandering, and fighting, and struggle, he’s reaping the rewards. Maybe he’s just sitting in the opening of his tent, just soaking in the wonder of his boy playing outside. And God calls. God says, “Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.” Again, I’m all about questions. I don’t ask for directions, that’s where I cross the line. But I mean, c’mon, “did I hear you correctly? You want me to take Isaac, the kid we sweated over, that you promised, that we waited a century for … and what? I must’ve missed something.”

But it says that the next day, early in the morning, Abraham loads Isaac up and heads for the sacrifice site. And he takes his son on the road to certain death, to sacrifice on an altar to the God who says that he loves him, and who loves his son. Isaac is old enough he knows what’s going on. “Um, Dad, we’ve got fire, wood, a really big knife… but where’s the lamb?” Abraham provides one of those answers we say, but we’re not really sure that what we want and hope for and need is actually what God has in mind: “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son.”

So Abraham builds an altar, ties up his son, and lays him on the altar. And draws back the knife and God calls out “Abraham! STOP!”

AND THERE’S A RAM CAUGHT IN THE THICKET.

And God says, “I swear by my own name, that because you have been obedient and not held onto your son, your only son, I will bless you. Your family will be as plentiful as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. And all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me.” This is the moment when the children of Abraham begin to become ONE TRIBE. When God established that the remnant saved on the ark wasn’t just one family but was an incorporation of people into ONE TRIBE, originated by the faith of one man. That people who never knew Abraham would receive God’s blessing.

Of course, this is the ONE TRIBE later fulfilled in the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. ONE TRIBE of people lifted out of sin, out of pain, out of rejection, out of despair to a life of hope, joy, and eternal relationship with God. This is the ONE TRIBE that should be unified in the Church (big “C”) but which too often is full of disunity and struggle, because ultimately, we’re still human. But the good news is that one man was willing to sacrifice his one and only son, the thing he held the most dear, to be obedient to God… and that God, who saw a heart that was willing to go all the way, would one day sacrifice his one and only son, the thing he held the most dear, to save ONE TRIBE from their broken situation.

Funny how things have a way of working out, how Abraham was just a precursor of the sacrifice God would go all the way with. Funny how obedience by a father reflects obedience by THE Son. But there’s nothing funny about being obedient to the call, no matter how hard, and recognizing in that sacrifice that God sees men (and women) after his own heart.

What is so dear to you that you could never lay it down? Even if God asked you to? Maybe he’s not calling you to lay it down. Maybe he will some day. But does your obedience to the call of the almighty, creator God resonate with you in a way that you’d go to your cross and lay it all down?

On Father’s Day, we celebrate the men who’ve stood up and served. Who’ve raised children with their wives, who raised children who weren’t their own. Who taught in classrooms, worked with teams, who lay down their own lives to be obedient to the call of God. If all of us would be as obedient as Abraham… wow. Are you there? I have some work to do.

In Hebrews 11:8-10, it says, “By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going. By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign country; he lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were heirs with him of the same promise. For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.” Abraham knew he was building something new. He knew that God’s promise of ONE TRIBE was so crazy, so ridiculous, that it had to be true. He went looking for something to hold onto, but he knew that he had to let go of what he did have if he wanted to gain more. If all of us were as giving as Abraham… wow.

Are you there? I have some work to do.

We could beat ourselves up pretty good about how we’re NOT like Abraham. Or we could recognize that God still speaks, in strange and mysterious ways, calling us from our comfort zone, asking us to lay down the stuff that’s filling our hands, so we can take up a new mission, and become better than we ever thought we could be. Merely asking us to be obedient to the call. Later in Hebrews 11, it says that by his faith, Abraham showed that he knew God’s promises would come true even if they weren’t through Isaac.

Abraham believed that dream wouldn’t die—that God could resurrect it one way or another. What we give up for the sake of God’s “tribe” comes back to us in full. What Abraham gave up was returned to him by a miraculous ram. What God gave up in Jesus was returned to him by the saving power of the resurrection.

What is God calling you to give up? Are you ready? Is it to sacrifice your expectations about your life or your church, to be Jesus even when it costs something? Is it to embrace someone not like you, who doesn’t believe what you do, and love them with the assurance that God’s grace is enough? Is it surrendering your dream to God, and recognizing that God’s will for your life is better than you can imagine? Is it laying you down so that others might truly live?

In every story that’s been told about a hero, the “good of the many has outweighed the good of the few” or the one. It’s true in the story of Jackie Robinson a real life hero who endured verbal jabs and worse to break the color barrier in baseball. It’s true in the story of Superman, as told by Zach Snyder in Man of Steel, out this weekend. Self-sacrifice is what unites the ONE TRIBE, taking it from that stage 5 of tribal development into a 6th: That of a group dedicated to the belief that life will be better for all, once we lay aside our personal needs and pursue God’s hope for us all. I call that group “church.” But THE ONE TRIBE works, too.

Posted in Pop Culture, Sermons, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters- Parody Or Lost Cause?

The movie business is all about “the latest craze.” We’ve seen the swell of support for movies about vampires and werewolves (thank you, Twilight, but you can sit down now), and the upswing in zombie movies (thank you, Walking Dead). But there are movies that fall before (Van Helsing) and after (Beautiful Creatures) that don’t quite arrive in time: such is the case of Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters.

Painted as a blend of parody and straight-up horror/action, the movie centers around the Brothers Grimm’s characters, the two children who thwart the forest-dwelling witch by shoving her in the oven. Hansel (the usually excellent Jeremy Renner) and Gretel (Gemma Arterton, Quantum of Solace) survive their run-in with the witch as children, lose both parents, and grow up to be witch hunters. “The only good witch is a dead one” as their motto, the two make money destroying dark forces (think Terry Gilliam’s The Brothers Grimm) until one town where they’re hired to save the children.

The humor, the action, the gore, and general script are all pretty standard. Famke Jannsen (Taken franchise) stars opposite the siblings as the evil witch trying to free all witches from the curse of burning to death; Peter Stormare plays a corrupt sheriff who is part malicious, part bumbling. Unfortunately, from a story and flow perspective, this one goes everywhere you’d expect it to and nothing really surprises. A few modern-inclusion items were amusing, like the old school defibrillator and insulin use, but otherwise, this was pretty stock.

Spoiler Alert: Of course, the revelations that a) their parents didn’t abandon them but died protecting them and b) that they were witches (that good witches existed!) seemed so obvious that they shouldn’t have counted as big reveals. But they did reveal a nominally pointed story about real-life in a fairy tale parable. The fact that we have choices and we’re not born a certain way tells us a lot about the worldview of the movie. If a witch could use their powers for good or evil, and chooses good, then that means a bad witch (or troll) could go good and vice versa. It allows that film’s and the human population’s worldview to be bigger than it initially would have been if everything was static and predetermined.

In the end, it’s not a great film but it’s not the worst one I’ve seen this spring.

Posted in Movie Reviews, Theology | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Atlantis, The Lost Empire: Finding Ourselves In The Sacred

As the DVD editor for Hollywood Jesus, I’ve watched my fair share of animated movies that I missed when they first released. Some were good, some were bad, and some were “why did they make this movie?” But occasionally, one comes along that makes me sorry I missed it the first time around. Such is the case with Atlantis: The Lost Empire, which is now released in high definition with its sequel (Milo’s Return) in two-movie combo pack from Walt Disney.

Atlantis tells the story of the mythic Atlantis, which may or may have existed, but which has been notoriously submerged for thousands of years per legend. Why it disappeared and where exactly it is are the stuff of mystery. But one lone linguist, Milo Thatch (Michael J. Fox), presses on toward the goal of discovery, following in the footsteps of his grandfather. This familial quest to discover something lost is laughed at and mocked by Thatch’s supervisors, but he’s offered a no-holds-barred quest by a friend of his grandfather’s, and he undertakes a serious, Jules Verne-like mission to the bottom of the sea.

Animated with the style of Hellboy’s Mike Mignola, this is a stunning story painted in visuals that captivate. The characterizations of Thatch and the crew commanded by Lyle Tiberius Rourke (James Garner) allows us to see a humanized cartoon ensemble; the underwater scenes make us feel like there are legitimate movements beneath the sea. But the most stunning work is left to the world of Kida (Cree Summer), the “face” of the remaining Atlantean race who Thatch will lead this expedition to reasonably quickly. This world is stunning, technologically and spiritually; we’re captivated by what is, the story of their society’s survival, and what could be, if the new world of Thatch and the old world of Kida would join forces.

The film is part adventure (Indiana Jones), part love story (The New World). Thatch’s belief in something that no one else would believe in or see is rewarded by the discovery of the Atlantean populations, but it’s stretched by his awareness of Kida. Her beauty, soul, and energy sucks him in and makes him bolder, even while others seek to capture that spirit of the Atlanteans for themselves. And that’s where the “adult” thinking comes into play.

Sure, we have a story of redemption that is about Thatch fulfilling his grandfather’s vision. But we’re also dealing with Rourke et al.’s desire to control the “advanced technology” of the Atlanteans, to make it something that could be used, manipulated for money or power. They want to control it, in much the same way that led to the destruction of Atlantis itself; they see beauty, knowledge, energy, and want it all for their own. That in itself is the story of greed, of power, of innate-to-actualized violence; wanting to control what others have or what seems to be for the good of all, dominating it just for oneself.

Ultimately, when we recognize that our lives, our resources, our grace is not just for us, but is for the community, for everyone in fact, we are released from a narrow way of looking at life into something that is much bolder, in higher definition. We recognize that we answer to a greater need, a greater hope, as both Thatch and Kida do, and our willingness to lay ourselves down for the good of the whole increases exponentially. Recognizing that life isn’t about us is one of the greatest steps toward becoming who God wants us to be, and it allows us to recognize that we are part of a much greater plan than we ever realized before.

Fans of the film will enjoy the special features that take us through some history (did Atlantis REALLY exist?) and see how the special Atlantean language was created, and ties to what we know today. The sequel, Milo’s Return, finds our two heroes exploring the surface world together, and continues one of the threads previously left alone (for the most part) about whether or not the technology that Atlantis had made proficient in was supposed to be used by the surface dwellers. Again, the question asks: who is this life for? And who is my neighbor?

Posted in Movie Reviews, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Sermon Today: You Want Me To What???

I’d recommend you read Genesis 6-9 before you read this. Or you could just keep it handy. Or read this and wonder what I’m talking about. Anyway…

Noah seemed like a good idea… and then Friday it rained and rained and rained. And I got pretty stir crazy. But it only rained for 36 hours here not days and days. Still, it definitely sets the mood for my Noah sermon.

Noah may be one of the most widely told and misunderstood stories in the Bible. Sure, there are cute fuzzy animals and little bath toys we can get for the kids. But somehow we fail to see the deep theological implications packed into the intense action of God in redeeming the world he created a mere six chapters into the Bible.

Like many other stories, the rough edges are worn off when we tell the stories to our kids.

In Genesis 6:5 The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.” But Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord. (NIV)

There is such intense evil in the world, the human heart was inclined to ONLY think of evil, that God regretted he’d made human beings.

God as Father regretted that he’d made humans, his children. And he said the only way to make things right was to start over.

God’s sense of goodness, his understanding of right and wrong, is so intense that he literally can’t tolerate evil. Sure, he gave humanity free will, but their inability to choose anything right was so far from what God hoped for humanity, that he knew he had to start over—to allow there to be a chance for goodness to even exist. An infinitely patient God who was thisclose to running out of patience.

And then God saw Noah.

Noah is called “righteous” and “blameless.” Noah tries to live his life “right.” He doesn’t have 10 Commandments or the teachings of Jesus, but he’s trying to be the kind of person that God is glorified by.

Noah is a family man—he’s not one of these men who is throwing himself after cheap relationships and sordid affairs. He’s raising three sons, married to one woman, ignoring the pressures of the society around him to be anything but who he is himself, created in the image of God.

But the writer of Genesis doesn’t want us to miss this: Noah is the thimble of righteousness floating in the seas of evil. He’s the outlier, the one of a kind. In this parabolic story of the “old days,” he’s the once in a lifetime kind of savior that God will continue to raise up to lead the people of Israel. And he’s the kind of man (minus the God part) that Jesus will be, making “Christ figure” a term appreciated by Christians and non- Christians alike.

So God TELLS Noah he’s going to end life as Noah knows it. And he tells Noah that God wants Noah to build an ark of cypress wood.

Now, I want to stop there for a moment. Noah, who is a farmer or a hunter/gatherer, is told to build a giant ark. The Biblical narrative doesn’t take a lot of time trying to describe how he received that information, but consider it here.

What goes through Noah’s mind? If you believe Evan Almighty, the Steve Carrell movie, Noah wants to know if he’s going crazy. If he’s exhausted or beaten down, if he’s seeing things or making them up himself.

I just want to know: what’s an ark?

But Noah dutifully records the dimensions that God gives him, he prepares it just the way that God tells him to.

Can you imagine what went through everyone else’s minds?

What went through the minds of Noah’s neighbors in between drunkenness and debauchery? What was Noah’s wife thinking? How about his sons? Their wives?

“This man has lost it. Someone needs to point out that there’s no water here. That we don’t even know what rain is.”

But Noah keeps building. Even while the haters are laughing at him, pulling up their lawn chairs to watch the spectacle.

And he brings his three sons, their wives, and his wife onto the ark. As well as a zoo full of animals. All the food they would need. All of the food the animals would need.

And God says he’ll make a covenant with Noah. What’s a covenant?

All of this while he’s 599 years old. Seriously.

And then 600 hundred year old Noah endured 40 days and 40 nights in the ark with all of those animals while it was raining, and his closest family members.

And then 150 days as the water stayed on the Earth. Seriously, which would’ve been tougher? The animal smell or the relative interaction?

And then God shut them in. Noah built the ark God told him to. But Noah couldn’t even shut the door. God had to shut the door.

And it says that everything that wasn’t in the ark died. People, birds, mammals. Everything.

And the ark got lifted higher and higher above the earth God had created, while the waters from above and below washed over the earth. Thousands of years later, Jesus would say in John 12:32 “And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.” Here’s one man in Genesis, Adam, making a choice that alters all of humanity; one man in Genesis, Noah, who alters all humanity’s future by being the one God takes hope and joy in; and later, God sends Jesus who will be one man who will alter all humanity forever.

But finally the water recedes. And Noah sends out a raven through the open window and it just kept flying around. A sign of death, it was transient.

But then Noah sent out a dove, not once, but twice, and it came back with a sign of peace, the olive leaf. Remember how a dove is the “symbol” of the way that the Spirit descends on Jesus at his baptism by John? God “baptizes” the world to cleanse it of evil through Noah, then baptizes Jesus to signify his place as the forgiveness of sins for all.

God instructed Noah to come out—every living creature to multiply, be fruitful, and increase in number. After nearly a year of being trapped inside the walls of the ark, who even knows if the Noah family was seasick??? They come outside, releasing the animals.

And Noah’s first move is to sacrifice the animals, at least some of them. SO we figure that some of the animals made more animals on the ark right? And there were probably some baby humans running around too…

And God says to Noah: “Never again will I curse the ground because of humans, even though every inclination of the human heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done. As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
will never cease.”

God promises Noah, whose a husband, a father, and probably a grandfather now, that God is watching over all of humanity. And that while judgment and punishment were necessary, it so grieved God’s heart to destroy the world he created, that he’s not going to do it again.

Which tells me one definitive thing about the goodness of God: it is not outweighed by the love God has for humanity.

So God makes the covenant with Noah in Genesis 9—that he will watch over them but that he expects they’re going to behave certain ways:

–  they’re not going to eat food while they animal is still bleeding

–  that God expects the Noah will only kill animals when necessary for food

– that anyone who kills a human will be held accountable too

– and all of this covenanting is through Noah—and sealed with a rainbow

And then Noah lived 350 more years until he died.

So a quick recap: God sees the world is bad, sees someone with a heart that really wants to be right, chooses to use him to save a whole nation, a whole humanity, and then, seeing all that goodness in Noah, God asked him to do the impossible… and sent him on the craziest cruise anyone has ever been on.

So if God would go there with the “most righteous” man on the Earth, what would he expect of us, who know Jesus, who have heard the good news?

What crazy, impossible, implausible, over the top, out of our comfort level, exciting, amazing thing will God ask us to do for him?

What amazing thing would God ask us to do so that everyone around us would be blessed?

I can guarantee that if you listen to the small voice of God in your heart and through the godly people around you, that you’ll be called to be different.

That people will mock you. That what you’re called to do seems unlikely.

But that in the end, if you follow God and his call on your life, God will be glorified and others will be blessed because of you.

On a day when we’ve celebrated adults who choose to be members here, who embrace what it means to be Christians and Methodist, as we get ready to partner with a church plant to impact our community for the kingdom of God, I find myself asking, “God, what it is that you want from me? What is it that you want from our church?”

Are you asking those questions? Are you ready for whatever wild adventure may be the answer?

Let’s get to building our “ark” for the glory of God, and for the blessing of our community. Amen.

Posted in Pop Culture, Sermons, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lilo & Stitch: Understanding Family

In almost every Walt Disney movie, there’s an individual who doesn’t belong, has been abandoned, or lost a parent. Somehow, they’re seeking to define their life based on those around them, because their ability to determine who they are based on “family of origin” has been disrupted. So it is with Lilo & Stitch and Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has A Glitch (releasing tomorrow on Blu-ray and DVD combo pack) but the story allows for two characters, one Hawaiian and one alien, to examine life together through the new lens of family.

To begin with, Stitch (Chris Sanders, How To Train A Dragon, The Croods) is the illegal genetic result of an space genius experiment, and is quickly adaptable, crafty, and indestructible. In other words, Stitch was someone’s idea of a Disney character after watching a two-year-old operate for a half hour! But Stitch (or Experiment 626) escapes, and crashlands on Hawaii’s Kauai, where he quickly becomes part of Lilo’s (Daveigh Chase) life. She has her own problems, as she’s causing trouble for her older sister Nani (Tia Carrere) who has been caring for Lilo since her parents died in a car crash, but soon Stitch escalates them all.

Throw in the interplanetary pursuit by the Galactic Federation and an Earth spy (Ving Rhames’ Cobra), and you’ve got a motley blend of sci-fi, drama, comedy, and action that will delight the whole family. But our awareness of how much this is about family won’t be dimmed. Lilo wants Nani to love her the way she is; Nani wants Lilo to respect her. Both are grieving and driven by their own immediate felt needs, not what the other needs. But this crazy little alien unites them, some other humans, and a few other alien beings into an indisputable family in classic Disney style.

Several years later, Disney made the direct-to-DVD sequel about Stitch running out of power, and experiencing a violent “glitch” that caused him to remove himself from the family, believing himself to be too dangerous. It’s the way so many of us deal with family issues (avoidance) rather than asking for him, and it’s the alien version of what Lilo and Nani did in the first film. We need each other, or to coin a U2 phrase, “we carry each other.” Regardless of what your family actually looks like, it’s the people who support you when you need them who are truly your family by blood or not. And when family is acting appropriately, say a support group or a church on a good day, we’re stronger for those bonds than we could ever be on our own.

Posted in Movie Reviews, Theology | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment