The Hierarchy Of Clean (A Mustard Seed Musing)

I like being clean. It’s not that I mind being dirty, like sweaty from a good workout at the gym or covered with dirt, grass, and leaves from raking the yard or working in the garden. But when I’m supposed to be clean, I want to be clean.

A few years ago, I was struck by the way that I subcategorized my own cleanliness.

There’s “mission trip clean.” If you’ve ever been on a no-frills mission trip, then you probably know what I mean. There are dozens of you, sleeping on the floor, usually in a room not intended for sleeping. You shower in a communal setting, often without the usual attributes of home like good lighting, regularly hot water, or even your good razor. But compared to the work you’re doing throughout the days of the mission trip, after a shower, you go to bed “mission trip clean.”

Lately, I’ve added the middle range, “hotel clean.” That’s the one where you try to ignore that the cleaning staff did their best, but you still found someone else’s hair in the drain, or in the sheets; it’s when you try to not figure out what the stains are from, or the oily feel of the remote. But still, you go to bed having a shower (usually with hot water), and the normal first-world amenities.

And then there’s “clean.” You have your house ready for your own expectations, with your favorite shampoo, good razor, optimal drying times, and sheets to your specifications. It’s the way you relax more often than not.

Unfortunately, this hierarchy of clean is too often applied to sin by insiders of the church. Depending upon your church and its social systemic beliefs, you may have experienced this or not. Here are some examples:

-In college, one of the campus ministries I participated with put “drinking alcohol” at the top of a rather long list of things that Christians shouldn’t, even couldn’t, do. If you were seen drunk on Saturday night, then you weren’t a Christian.

-In grad school, some of my peers put “extramarital sex” at the top of list. Ironically, some of them had participated in this before, but having repented of it, they were now able to point fingers at those who were found ‘guilty.’

-In churches I have been over the last ten years, those who were “gay” or “judgmental” or “addicted to [….]” or “deviant” were deemed the worst.

Now, whether you think one or any of these is actually a sin or not, here’s my point: there’s no hierarchy in my understanding of sin. No one can point at another person and say, “their sin is worse than mine.” Whenever we get to that point, we’re forgetting our sin and focusing on theirs. If theirs looks worse to us, then we’ve forgotten what we’ve done to the point where we’re blinded to our own.

Sin is something that breaks in or fragments our relationship with God. Romans 8:38-39 (The Message) states Paul’s opinion about God’s love: “I’m absolutely convinced that nothing—nothing living or dead, angelic or demonic, today or tomorrow, high or low, thinkable or unthinkable—absolutely nothing can get between us and God’s love because of the way that Jesus our Master has embraced us.” Sin can’t cause God to stop loving us but it can mess up the relationship.

And while I considered how good my shower at home was going to feel the last time I went away, it struck me that ultimately, there’s only one kind of clean for all kinds of sin: it’s the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Because whether you think you’re just a little bit dirty or absolutely filthy, Jesus’ grace is the only thing that can wash away the sin.

And it’s one size clean fits all.

Posted in Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Should Christians Watch?

This originally ran on HollywoodJesus.com. You can join the conversation there, or respond below if you’re so inclined. I’m interested in your responses either way!

What is redeemable? What isn’t? What should we watch to better our lives and improve our worldview? What should we avoid because it is filthy, despicable, artless, unredeemable, evil, etc.? If you haven’t asked what you should be watching, I encourage you to stop and think about how you decide what you’ll consider viewing. But to be honest, even the fine writers of Hollywood Jesus don’t always agree about where to draw the line.

On January 6, Trevin Wax, the managing editor of Lifeway’s The Gospel Project, wrote aprovocative editorial about his fundamentalist upbringing and the way it impacted his expectations about what he should watch, and what media was worth his time in general. Wax wonders whether or not we’ve gotten caught up in “avoiding the appearance of being ‘holier-than-thou’ than we do in avoiding evil itself,” but says that it seems like it might be more complicated than we try to make it.

Wax uses a Christianity Today review of The Wolf of Wall Street and his own review of Tom Hooper’s Les Miserables to underscore that the same topics, like greed, violence, and lust, can be presented in different ways, with different results.

And honestly, this led to one of the best discussions we’ve had as HJ Staffers in quite some time.

Alas, the discussion happened on Facebook, and we wondered: what do you think?

Are you of the mindset that I Corinthians 10:23 (”You say, ‘I am allowed to do anything’–but not everything is good for you. You say, ‘I am allowed to do anything’–but not everything is beneficial”) or Mark 7:15 (”Nothing outside a person can defile them by going into them. Rather, it is what comes out of a person that defiles them”)? Does Romans 14:13-14 (”Therefore let us not pass judgment on one another any longer, but rather decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of a brother. I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean.”) speak to your decision-making?

At Hollywood Jesus, we have always taken the approach that we would review what we were each individually called to or inclined to review. I personally made it through the first fifth of Don Jon before determining that it wasn’t the right type of movie for me; Darrel Manson wrote a fine review about how the film asks us to consider where we get our direction when it comes to love and relationships here. Two people of faith and the same movie, and two different responses.

But maybe it’s not the film itself or the rating (there are some PG-13 movies that are raunchier than the R-rated The King’s Speech). Maybe it’s the viewer, and what they bring to watching the film. Have you ever considered that?

What do you consider when you go to see a film? Do its ethics or your ethics matter? What should faithful people watch?

Posted in Current Events, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Sermon Today: Gone Fishing (Luke 5:1-11)

Some of the best religious jokes revolve around water.

Joke #1:

Moses and Jesus are golfing and arrive at a water hazard. Jesus pulls out a 9-iron. Moses says, ‘hey, you really should be using a driver for this’. ‘No way’, says Jesus. ‘I saw Tiger Woods play this hole last week. He sunk it with a 9 iron. If Tiger can do it, I can do it’. Jesus tees up, swings… hits the ball which sails into the water. Moses says, ‘I’ll go get it…’. He walks down to the water, parts it, grabs Jesus’ ball, walks back up and hands it to him.

Jesus tees up again with his nine iron. ‘Jesus,’ says Moses, ‘don’t you want to try the driver’?. ‘No’ says Jesus, ‘Tiger Woods did this with his nine iron, so I can do it’. He hits the ball, which again sails into the water. ‘I’ll get it’, says Jesus. He walks down the hill, and walks across the water, reaching in to his shoulder to fish around for his ball.

The foursome behind Moses and Jesus has caught up and are standing there, stunned. Pointing at Jesus on top of the water, one of them says ‘Who does that guy think he is, Jesus?’ ‘No’, says Moses. ‘He thinks he’s Tiger Woods’.

Joke #2:

A mother was watching her four year-old son playing outside in
a small plastic pool half-filled with water. He was happily walking
back and forth across the pool, making big splashes.
Suddenly, the little boy stopped, stepped out of the pool, and
began to scoop water out of the pool with a pail.
“Why are you pouring the water out, dear?” asked the mother.
“Because my teacher said Jesus walked on water, and this water
won’t work,” he replied.

Joke #3:

There was an old man sitting on his porch watching the rain fall. Pretty soon the water was coming over the porch and into the house. The old man was still sitting there when a rescue boat came and the people on board said, “You can’t stay here you have to come with us or you will drown.” The old man replied, “Nope, I’m staying put, Jesus will save me.”

So the boat left. A little while later the water was up to the second floor, and another rescue boat came, and again they told the old man he had to come with them. The old man again replied, “Jesus will save me.”

So the boat left him again. An hour later the water was up to the roof and a third rescue boat approached the old man, and tried to get him to come with them. Again the old man refused to leave stating that, “Jesus will save me.”

So the boat left him again. Soon after, sadly, the man drowns and goes to heaven. When he sees Jesus, he angrily asks him, “Why didn’t you save me?” Jesus replied, “I tried. I sent three boats after you!!”

“One day as Jesus was standing by the Lake of Gennesaret the people were crowding around him and listening to the word of God.”

No joke. There was a time when people actually begged to hear more Scripture and longer sermons. But that was from Jesus, and you all are stuck with me.

But Jesus gets into a boat because the people are crowding him, and asks him to go deeper into the lake. Now, this lake is called “garden of riches,” but these fishermen, these brothers, have not had a good night fishing.

That’s kind of an oxymoron though: “a good night fishing.” I’ve always seen fishing as the equivalent of hunting in the dark with no way to see what you’re shooting at! But these guys, who are by their own decision “fishermen,” haven’t caught anything.

And Jesus tells Peter to stop in the deep water and let down the nets.

Jesus, fully God and fully man, is the son of a carpenter. He’s not a fisherman. It would be like me showing up at your place of work and telling you how to do your job better than you know how to. Now granted, that’s pretty typical: most of us have told doctors how they got it wrong, referees how they’re destroying the game, and cooks how they could make the food better.

But I don’t think that’s Jesus point in telling Peter how to fish. But argumentative Peter only says, “listen, we’ve worked hard and there are no fish, but because you said so, to humor you, I’ll let them down.”

And the result is that they catch so many fish that they can’t pull them all in to the boat. They have to call for help. Their nets are exceeded to the point of breaking and sinking the boat. They have caught so many fish that it exceeds their expectations, not just because they haven’t caught anything but what they could’ve expected to catch on any given time out!

Peter is so convinced by this catch of fish, which shows how crazy it was, right? that he kneels before Jesus and confesses that he is sinful and unworthy of Jesus’ presence! Seriously, what has it taken in your life to so convict you that you immediately repented??

And Jesus uses this opportunity to tell Peter: “Don’t be afraid; from now on you will fish for people.” Remember all of those DNBA in the birth narratives of Jesus? Gabriel tells Zechariah, Mary, Joseph, and the shepherds not to be afraid– and now it’s Jesus who is issuing the encouragement and comfort. Just like those early DNBAs, it’s followed with the most epic of fish stories:

“you’re no longer going to fish for aquatic beings, but you’re going to fish for men.”

These simple men, these uneducated, hardworking, rabble-rousers left their nets and their boats, their livelihood and quite possibly all they had to their names, and followed Jesus.

What would it take for you to leave everything and really, really follow Jesus? To completely turn away from all of your excuses about how you’re too busy, or too poor, or too whatever, and fully embrace a “go crazy, dare to dream” kind of discipleship after Jesus?

I’m not going to show up at your workplace and tell you that you’ve got it all wrong. But what if Jesus does? How are you going to respond? Do you already know there’s something about how you work and interact with others that has to change? Do you know that if Jesus showed up at your house that you’d have to change how it appeared or what you were doing before you could let him in? Are your relationships needing tidied up, your influences needing edited, your attitudes needing a New Year’s cleaning?

I wonder sometimes what would happen if Jesus walked in right now and said, “you guys are getting this all wrong.” Or, more gently, he stepped inside and told us that we needed to “go catch fish” on the other side or a different location? What would happen if he told us that we needed to redefine our vision for what it meant to follow him?

I hope I would have the grace to say, “we’ve been working on this really hard, and we’re tired, but because you say so, we will.”

The good news today is that Jesus showed up where the fishermen were, that he wasn’t threatened by the overwhelming crowd, or the unexpected response. That Jesus was willing to go into deeper water and boldly challenge the fishermen to keep trying. That Jesus met them where they were but didn’t leave them there. That Jesus had a greater calling for Peter, James, and John than to keep wearing themselves out doing the same things with little results.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

The fishermen were there and sometimes we are, too! But this good news, that Jesus shows up, goes deeper, and is willing to show unsuspecting, unprepared simple folks the way is excellent news for us! We simply can’t do it without Jesus, because without him we are wandering and visionless, insanely expecting different results.

But Jesus doesn’t give up and neither should we. Stop doing the same things to battle your anxiety, frustration, and unhappiness. Turn to Jesus and hand over the controls to your life’s boat, and let him show you a new way to work, to relate, to live.

Just don’t expect to pray that prayer and end up staying stuck for long. Because when you go fishing with Jesus, the catch is amazing, and overwhelming, and life changing.

Friends, to go fishing with Jesus is to come back with one, epic fish story.

Don’t look for me in the same place anymore, I’ve gone fishing.

This sermon is for the 11 a.m. service at Blandford United Methodist Church on January 12. 

Posted in Current Events, Pop Culture, Sermons, Theology | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Sermon Today: Taboo Break Dancing (John 4)

I am not good at small talk. I want to be good at it, but more often then not, I just plough right in.

You look like you’re struggling… “what’s the problem?”

You’re angry… “what did I/someone else do?”

You have a problem… “how can I fix it?”

Okay, so that last one is dangerous, especially when we’re talking maritally, right? Men, we’re supposed to listen, not solve the problem.

But the thing is, in the story that John shares in John 4, Jesus defies our rules for engaging our spouses in conversation, and frankly, most of the things they teach you in counseling.

Let’s set the stage. Jesus’ disciples are baptizing so many people that the Pharisees are hounding Jesus. He leaves the region of Judea and heads toward Galilee. But he has to pass through the region of Samaria.

Now, we have the power of hindsight and we know that Samaritans are good, at least the one mentioned in the Parable of the Good Samaritan. (It says it right there in the title.) But the thing is that Samaritans weren’t “good,” to most of the folks that were listening to Jesus’ parables. The fact that we call that Samaritan, who saved a man beaten and left for dead, when the teacher of the law and the priest passed him by, good, in fact is the point. An outsider “got it” when the insiders didn’t.

These outsiders, from Samaria, were persona non grata to the Jews. They didn’t follow the customs, and they didn’t get it “right,” as far as the Jews were concerned. The Samaritans had intermarried with the Assyrians, who had previously been the invaders of Israel, and they held to their own interpretive version of the Bible with a different Temple. The Jews were having none of this and avoided traveling through Samaria like they might pick up instant death just by setting foot there.

And Jesus goes from point A to point B… on a straight line.

Jesus 1, Taboo 0.

So, Jesus sends his disciples into town to buy food and settles in for a moment, tired by the journey, at a well that Jacob had built. And when a Samaritan woman came to get water from the well, because, well (pun intended), they didn’t have running water in their homes, Jesus asked her for a drink. He’s not supposed to talk to a solitary woman, and certainly not a Samaritan one!

Jesus 2, Taboo 0.

Have you ever gotten caught up in such small-minded separation movements? Consider this story:

I was walking across a bridge one day, and I saw a man standing on the edge, about to jump off. So I ran over and said, “Stop! Don’t do it!”

“Why shouldn’t I?” he said. I said, “Well, there’s so much to live for!”

He said, “Like what?”

I said, “Well, are you religious or atheist?” He said, “Religious.” I said, “Me too!”

“Are your Christian or Buddhist?” He said, “Christian.” I said, “Me too!”

“Are you Catholic or Protestant?” He said, “Protestant.” I said, “Me too!”

“Are your Episcopalian or Baptist? He said, “Baptist!” I said, “Wow! Me too!”

“Are your Baptist Church of God or Baptist Church of the Lord? He said, Baptist Church of God!” I said, “Me too!”

“Are your Original Baptist Church of God or are you Reformed Baptist Church of God?” He said, “Reformed Baptist Church of God!” I said, “Me too!”

“Are you Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1879, or Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1915?” He said, “Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1915!”

I said, “Die, heretic scum!” and pushed him off.

When did we lose sight of the “me toos”? Jesus doesn’t roll that way: Jesus is thirsty, and he’s fully God and fully man, so he asks for a drink.

Now, we’ve seen this pattern. Someone asks Jesus something or tells him something and he doesn’t directly respond. He basically says back, “if you knew who I was, you’d have given me a drink.”

And, “I would’ve given you living water.”

Last week, Nicodemus wanted to know (John 3) how he could climb back into his mother’s womb. He knew it was ridiculous. And here, this woman in Samaria knows Jesus can’t get into the well to get himself a drink, so how could he promise her living water? What even is this living water?

Jesus tells the woman that drinking water wears off, that you eventually get thirsty. But he tells her that he has a kind of water that will be self-generating internally in a person, that the water will lead to eternal life.

Our friend, the Samaritan woman, keeps thinking literally. It’s too easy not to, and too confusing sometimes to understand what Jesus has to say. So she says, “um, okay, I’d like to not be thirsty, so give me some.” If this happened today, you could see this working this way.

A woman comes to the water cooler and goes to get one of those pointy cups. A man tells her he’d trade her some living water if she’d let him use her cup. She asks, “what’ve you got, Gatorade?”

We have to assume that Jesus can see that she’s not getting it, but how can she, when he’s talking in code no one understands yet?

So he switches tacts, and says, “go get your husband.” ‘Let’s make this is a real, kosher conversation.’

It’s not that Jesus hasn’t been talking about things that matter, but this is the moment where we can see that the world is about to get small, that the conversation is about to get real, that somehow, Jesus has gotten to the moment where he’s not just a thirsty dude, he’s the Son of God who isn’t playing around. 

I imagine the woman getting a little smaller. There’s a moment of terror that crosses her face. There’s a third taboo that’s about to be broken, because Jesus is making the private public.

“I have no husband,” she whispers meekly.

Jesus says back, “I know. You’re with a sixth man after your first five husbands. You have bounced from relationship to relationship to relationship. You’re no longer living in the law.”

And Jesus tells her in one simple stroke that he knows her. He doesn’t know about her. He knows her.

In Max Lucado’s You Are Special, the wooden Wemmicks live in town, while their creator Eli lives in the house on the hill. The Wemmicks have become practiced at giving each other stickers, stars and dots. Stars go to the Wemmicks who are pretty, smart, accomplish great feats of strength and movement. Dots go to the Wemmicks who are less attractive, clumsy, and awkward. Punchinello is a Wemmick in the second category, covered with dots and a low opinion of himself. 

But one day, Punchinello meets a Wemmick who has no sticker stars, Lucia, and asks her how she exists with no stickers. The very absence of stars would merit her getting dots from some Wemmicks! She tells him that every day, she goes to the house of Eli, and spends time with him, and encourages Punchinello to go there. 

Punchinello questions why the creator would care about him, but he pushes his way through the great door of the house and enters. He’s concerned by the size and mystery of things, and turns to go, when Eli calls him by name: “Punchinello.” Eli proceeds to remind him that he is special to Eli because Eli made him. That is enough! And Eli invites Punchinello to return everyday to see him. 

Our little Wemmick turns to leave with a smile, and thinks, “he really thinks I’m special,” and with that, one of Punchinello’s dots falls to the ground.

Don’t we all want to be known? I think there are two yearnings of the human heart that really cut to the chase of our lives: to be known by others and to matter. Jesus shares the first with the woman, and she responds by acknowledging the power of Jesus that she can see but she’s still stuck on the fact that he’s a Jew and she’s not. She’s still on Taboo #1.

Jesus tells her that this doesn’t matter- that where you worship (Taboo #4) isn’t a “thing” anymore. It will one day not matter where you worship but that you worship at all, that worship will be in Spirit and truth.” And he announces to her that she is the Messiah.

We know from the response that Jesus’ declaration causes an uproar. It causes Jesus’ Jewish disciples to question internally why he was talking to a woman. And it causes the Samaritan woman to go back and tell the rest of the town that they have to come out and see Jesus. To hear and believe. Taboo #5 is that this woman is so empowered by her interaction with Jesus that she becomes a teacher and a leader, an evangelist, in a paternalistic society that told her to be quiet and to stay in the shadows. 

And it says that a crowd came to see and hear Jesus and believed.

All because Jesus was thirsty.

All because Jesus was the master taboo breaker.

Think about the kind of people God used throughout the Bible to expand the audience of the message, all outsiders in their own way:

Noah was a drunk.

Abraham was too old.

Jacob (no relation) was a liar. 

Gideon was afraid.

David was a womanizer and murderer.

Rahab was a prostitute.

Peter denied Christ.

Lazarus was dead. 

Let’s hit the quick recap:

There’s a woman who has been trying to heal a hurt, fill a hole, satisfy a need, and she’s tried it with relationships that can’t satisfy her. Jesus shows up, trying to take a break, and rest. The woman’s need exceeds Jesus’ pursuit of solitude. Jesus offers this outcast woman the good news of salvation through gentle confrontation, and images she can understand, inviting her into an “insider” relationship with God. The woman embraces this good news, and recognizing she has crossed a line into true freedom, her first move is to go and share it with everyone who will listen. 

Is that us? Have we been stuck dealing with taboos that artificially separate us and keep us isolated and alone? Have we been trying to fill the God-sized holes in our hearts with our marriages, our addictions, our jobs, our purchases, or our Facebook accounts? (Seems a little funny to say Facebook accounts, but none of those things are God-sized so they’re all ridiculous!) Have we been blinded to people that Jesus is calling us to love because we think we’re not supposed to talk to them or be with them or to even like them? Even the disciples struggled with that! But if we’re going to show up to church and act like we want to be like Jesus then we need to do things that make us look, smell, sound, and act like Jesus.

The first piece of good news I want to make sure you read today is this: it doesn’t matter what you’ve done to try and fill the God-sized hole, and it’s not too late to let God fill it. That Samaritan woman repented of her sins to Jesus and changed her ways by going to share the good news with others. It doesn’t matter if you’ve been addicted to yourself, or your stuff, or your alcoholism, or your hoarding, you can let it go. But you can’t let God fill the Godsized hole until you kick out, tear down, rip apart all of the junk you’ve got jammed into it. It doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks about what you’ve done either. Sure, it may take time for the consequences of your previous decisions to wash away, but the living water can clean you up and shine you as God’s redeemed creation.

I grew up on an island, and I used to love to go down to the edge of the water and sit on this big rock that was taller than I was. I’d sit there and watch the water on the waves, and listen to the gentle lapping of the waves on the shore. This was living water, alive, life-giving, stretching past what the eye could see and too immense to be fully understood.

The second piece of good news I want you to read today is this: it’s not too late to repent of our homophobic, racist, classicist, denominational, misogynistic ostracization of whoever we deem to be “other”.  (Whoa, did he just go there?) If we’re going to set the standard for what it means to be followers of Jesus and not the negative connotations that our friends, neighbors, and families have sometimes felt toward the term “Christian,” then we need to reframe what it means to be like Jesus. I want to take back the term from the Westboros and the Pat Robertsons and claim in the name of Jesus that a Christian is someone who loves God and loves their neighbor and leaves the judging of another person’s worth to the Creator of the Universe.

Paul wrote in Romans 14 that we should “welcome with open arms fellow believers who don’t see things the way you do. And don’t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don’t agree with—even when it seems that they are strong on opinions but weak in the faith department. Remember, they have their own history to deal with. Treat them gently.” Is that the way you’ve come to understand church?

I want to see the term Christian be synonymous with a church that puts an end to slave trafficking, homelessness, and hunger, more than I care about whether or not a person needs to be immersed or sprinkled when they get baptized.

I want to be so filled by the living water that I shine, that I glimmer, with the joy of the redeemed and the forgiven and the outsider-turned-insider.

Jesus did not ignore that this woman needed help, or deny her sin. Jesus did not tell her she was alright and okay the way she was. But in offering her the good news of the living water, he called her to repentance and offered her ownership, a place, a sanctuary, in the open arms of God. She could change, be restored, but the move toward wholeness was going to require ripping off the things she’d used to mask her struggle.

In The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, there’s a boy who becomes a dragon. The boy’s name is Eustace, and the important thing to note here is that Eustace cannot change himself back. He tries to reveal his true self, but he’s stuck. He tears at the scales of his dragon covering, but he can’t undo his transformation. He knows who he was, but he can’t be restored.

Of course, Aslan arrives and Aslan, as Jesus, offers this boy/dragon a chance to change, but in the process, he will have to tear off the scales. Eustace says, “The first tear he made was so deep, that I thought it had gone right into my heart. When he began pulling the skin off, it hurt worse than anything I’d ever felt.”

Aslan could help Eustace; Jesus could help the woman. Aslan reminded Eustace that he was a boy, not a dragon. Jesus reminded the woman that she was loved by God, that she was not the “woman who had six husbands” or “rejected” or however her community had come to identify her. She was a child of God.

Whatever taboos hold you back, from God above or each other, I pray you kick them to the curb today, and embrace the mighty message of the risen one, Jesus, as translated in The Message: “The time is coming—it has, in fact, come—when what you’re called will not matter and where you go to worship will not matter.  It’s who you are and the way you live that count before God.”

May God look at who we are and how we live, and recognize that we have drunk deep from the living water.

This is the sermon for The Stand at Blandford United Methodist Church on January 12 at 9 a.m. 

Posted in Current Events, Pop Culture, Sermons, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Interview With The Hands Free Mama

Rachel Macy Stafford is the author of Handsfreemama.com and the originator of the Hands Free Revolution. She recently gave me the opportunity to review her first book in advance, and provided time to answer questions about her decisions, her faith, and her writing process. 

Thank you for taking some time to answer these questions! I have to admit that your book has really challenged me to evaluate how I spend time, especially in regards to my children and my wife. Thank you for your openness and vulnerability.

Tell us about your background in the years leading up to your Hands Free decision.

When my younger daughter was two-years-old, her older sister went to kindergarten. I’d spent the previous five years taking care of my family and moving to several new cities in a short time period. So when my older child went to kindergarten and my younger child was no longer a baby, I dove into activities that stimulated my mind, allowed for use of my God-given talents, and engaged me in conversations with other adults—activities I had been desperately missing. With each successful event I chaired, I felt validated. I discovered an identity other than “Mom.” I was filling a five-year void.

But I took it too far.

And while I was doing good for so many, my family got lost. The pace of my life became a constant mad dash to a finish line that couldn’t be reached. I began gripping my devices tighter than the hands of my loved ones. I was yes to everything outside the home and no to the most important activities inside the home—like playing, laughing, and making memories. I was buried beneath the weight of my distractions. I wasn’t living anymore—I was barely existing.

-For those who haven’t read the book or blog yet, what prompted the Hands Free Mama movement?

The impact of the small changes I was making in my life to overcome my distracted and perfectionistic ways were so immediate and so profound that I knew I must share them. As an educator, writer, and encourager, I felt certain this was my purpose in life. I knew the people who would most likely benefit from my Hands Free messages were people who read blogs and engaged in social media so I chose those mediums to share my message.

Within the first week of debuting my blog, the messages came pouring in. People were thanking me for being open and honest about my struggles. People revealed that they needed this message—that they longed to hear this message—and joined me on my journey. Now there are over a million people who visit my blog each month, showing up to be encouraged and offer encouragement to those wanting to live and love more each day.

-What was the hardest thing for you to give up when it came to the Hands Free model?

Well, I can tell you it was not the phone. And it was not the packed social calendar or affirmations for successful achievements. It was the façade of having it all together—that everything in my life was perfect. Living truly Hands Free meant embracing (and revealing) my imperfections, my missteps, and my humanness.

But when I freed the painful truths locked in my soul, I offered someone else the chance to say, “Me too.” And meeting another person in the light of realness means you are not alone and change comes more easily. Our inner scars may be created from different experiences and circumstances, but yet they look comfortingly familiar when we speak them out loud.

-What has been the greatest blessing in changing your habits?

By far my favorite aspect of living Hands Free is getting to know my family. Because I am not blinded by my distractions, I can truly SEE them. And when you see your loved ones as they are and hear their words, you begin to know them as individuals. Because you are available, they begin to confide in you; they trust you. Having a very close bond with the members of my family is the most rewarding aspect of living with open hands, open eyes, and open hearts.

-You reference your small group and your church in the book. What role did those communities play in your decision to change your habits?

Individual relationships with people in my small group and church family were vital to becoming more authentic and open about my struggles with distraction. When I shared my desire to scale back and invest in what truly mattered to me, many friends joined me. It helped me stay accountability to share this journey with people who shared similar goals. When I began sharing my journey on handsfreemama.com, members of my church family were some of the first people who responded, “I am joining you on this journey.” My church family went on to share my blog posts and encourage me in countless ways on my pursuit to become a published author.

-Inspiration doesn’t seem to follow a schedule, so what guidelines have you put in place to help you write AND maintain your Hands Free lifestyle? What advice would you give others?

I strive to maintain boundaries between writing and family time, which can be challenging due to my active “writer’s brain” and the accessibility/lure of technology. However, I have found that I feel rejuvenated when I step back from writing to spend time with my loved ones. I also get inspired. Many of my stories come from the moments I spend living Hands Free. I keep a small notebook handy wherever I go. I jot one or two word ideas down and then go back to them when it is my designated work time. I regularly unplug for a week at a time when we take family vacations. I always come away feeling uplifted after being “off the grid.” I definitely think taking time to relax and be alone with my own thoughts makes me more productive as a writer.

-How do you decide what’s “ok” to share about your family in a public, unfiltered setting? Do you see that changing as your daughters get older?

I ask permission of anyone whose story I share in my blog and this includes my children. I do not share things that would embarrass them now or later in life. I stick to the inspiring lessons they teach me. Thus far, my children are very proud to be included in my blog and book. I always share the results/positive comments that result when something they taught me is shared on my blog. For example, my older daughter sent a dollar bill to a former babysitter so she could adopt her Ugandan son. I wrote a story about it and it inspired thousands of people to send a dollar.  My sitter recently brought her son home. This has brought great joy to my daughter and reminded my family how small efforts can inspire big results.

If my children were ever to say, “I don’t want to be in your blog anymore,” I would respect that. I would find other ways to share the things I am learning on my Hands Free journey.

-What advice would you give to a writer or blogger about writing that you wish you would’ve learned earlier on?

*Don’t second-guess yourself based on what the “experts” say. You know what is best for your audience—even if it is an audience of one. Don’t feel like you have to follow any blog “rules” – just do something you can stick with and feel good about.

*Write from your heart. If you are not being honest, it will show in your writing. People gravitate toward authenticity and honesty.

*Find your own measure of success that is not tied to stats or “going viral.” Mine was to touch ONE life. If I touched one life by sharing my story that is what brought me great joy at the end of the day.

-What’s the next step for you at Hands Free Mama? I am currently on chapter 6 of my second book. Because distraction will always be a part of my life, I continue to learn new ways to be present and meaningfully connected. Writing about my experiences helps me stay true to my Hands Free commitment, and I just love sharing my discoveries with others.

Posted in Books, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

I Hate New Year’s Resolutions (A Mustard Seed Musing)

I hate New Year’s Resolutions. No, wait, maybe that’s too strong; maybe, I strongly dislike them. Maybe it’s not the idea of the thing but rather that resolutions seem to be too easily broken and discarded. As in, “I’m going to stop drinking Coke,” and then after three days (if we’re lucky), when we go back to drinking Coke, the resolution no longer has any power. So, while I’m always a proponent of positive change, I have a ridiculously strong anti-resolution sentiment.

Resolutions seem to linger around the first of each new year, like we can’t articulate change at any other time of the year. Sure, people work out (or tan) to prepare for their annual beach trip, but why wait? [I went back to the gym on some random day in October because I needed to start working out. Should I have waited until New Year’s Day?] Some people recognize their need for a change in their work schedule, or their spending, or their eating, but again, why wait?

But I like goals.

Goals, someone once wrote on a T-shirt, are made to be broken. Goals aren’t a maintenance of something that once that line is crossed, that it’s over, but are rather the benchmarks by which we lift ourselves from where we are to something better. Goals allow us to shoot for the stars but potentially move from the planet’s core to the sky to the stratosphere to first inkling of space, one stage at a time. Goals aren’t any less because they haven’t been broken yet but when they have been broken, they usually create an opening for more goals to rise up.

So, with that, I present some goals for 2014. If they are helpful to you, please reply below. If they’re not, consider what goals you yourself should be setting for 2014.

I will be more intentional and more disciplined in 2014. I will not treat money or time as disposable commodities but rather as investments for the future. I will invest them for the good of my children, and for the good of the community. In fact, I find myself wondering what it would look like if we each took Matthew 22:36-38 seriously: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself'”?

What if we applied it when it came to time? If I am more disciplined about getting my work done, about not wasting time on fleeting pursuits, and instead allow myself to be fully available, would those around me be blessed? Would I have more time for prayer and study, not just for sermon preparation, if I didn’t stay up too late and then find myself oversleeping? If we adopted that perspective, would we see our spouses, our children, and our community differently? What happens if we put down the phrase “just a minute” and picked up instead, “how can I help?”

What if we applied it when it came to finances? What if we didn’t buy our $5 Starbucks when we weren’t really thirsty or didn’t eat out when we could pack a lunch, so that the money could be spent elsewhere? What if we spent dollar for dollar on someone else as we spent a dollar on ourselves? What if we recognized that tithing (however you interpret it) was just the beginning but that all of what we have is God’s and for the blessing of all?

What if we applied it when it came to the good news of Jesus Christ? What if we stopped thinking about how we might be received when we shared our story and instead started thanking God for how we’ve been blessed, and started thinking about how those folks who hadn’t heard would be blessed to?

Sure, I intend to read a book a week, to see films that will challenge me and make me think, to lose the extra ten pounds that have been clinging to me for the last ten years. But ultimately, my goals are more deeply reaching and intense than mere to-do lists and weight check-ins. That doesn’t make them harder or easier, but they are habit changing, life-changing proposals.

Being intentional and disciplined means being more self-aware, more focused. Right now, the goals seem daunting but the rewards look pretty priceless.

Posted in Books, Current Events, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hands Free Mama: The Gift Of Now (Book Review)

Let’s be clear: Rachel Macy Stafford’s blog and book are not just for stay-at-home moms, or people who are worried about saving a marriage or a relationship with a child. They are for those wise enough to recognize that the “right now” might be all we have, and that what we do with those moments is all we can really control. And to be quite honest, Stafford’s book Hands Free Mama is changing my life.

If I’m going to be honest, there are probably three books that have changed the course of my life in how I make decisions and how I do ministry: The Bible, Charles Sheldon’s In His Steps, and Doug Fields’ The Purpose Driven Youth Ministry. Stafford’s book has already become a fourth in the brief time I have been reading it. Rather than knocking out this review within hours of reading, I put it down and went to play with my kids, I caught myself starting to say “just a minute” (several times) and instead engaged those around me, and turned away from multi-tasking.

[For me, multitasking at its finest once included playing the Playstation 2, watching a movie on the portable DVD player, carrying on an online chat on the computer, and answering the phone in between texting. Watch TV? That hardly ever happened without a book in my hand or a computer on my lap.]

Hands Free Mama finds us reflecting with Stafford about our own use of technology and time, our own inner Type-A behavior (and our own laziness at other times). She artfully tells her story and that of her family in a way that we begin to identify with our own negative behaviors without ever feeling judged: this is her gift to us, that we are given the “right now,” without ever having anyone besides ourselves point a finger. Stafford’s willingness to tell her own story so fluently allows us to see her process from harried mother and wife into the hands free mama she has become.

The contents here are broken into twelve “steps”: awareness, connectedness, deliberateness, presentness, serenity, clarity, simplification, acceptance, authenticity, forgiveness, compassion, and gratefulness. Stafford asks us to consider what we are giving up by being too busy, in terms of what we’re missing out on and what we can’t get back, sharing her own stories about what she missed and what she has reclaimed.

My copy of the book is dog-eared and will be revisited, but Stafford’s “new eyes” show us that a mundane car ride, simple chores, homework, and waiting in line can all be possibilities we’re missing because we don’t see them the right way. A friend sent me the link for a Hands Free Mama post, “The Bully Too Close To Home,” that sent me after the book, but the straightforward delivery, and its practical application, make the book a must-read for 2014.

In a world where we’re told to aggressively technologize ourselves, Stafford asks us if we’re using technology for the things we said we would when we started: community, time-saving, and efficiency. She’s not anti-technology (she writes that blog!) but she asks us if we’re losing ourselves in the “doing” rather than the “being,” even if we think we’re “doing” for the betterment of the world or in the service of God.

Stafford is intent on using her time to connect with her daughters and her husband, but it’s also about making a difference through her church or through non-profits like Compassion International and Operation Christmas Child. She’s not writing to make more time to make money or work more, but to revel in life’s little moments and to share those moments with others.

I’m not sure what I expected when I asked for the opportunity to read the book and interview Stafford, but what I’ve found has been so much more. Ultimately, I imagine myself looking back a year from now and recognizing that there are four books that changed my life, and I’ll have Stafford to thank for that. Right now, it’s time to put the computer and phone away and get back to being a daddy jungle gym, an attentive listener, and maybe, just maybe, a better man.

As of January 7, Hands Free Mama is available here.

Posted in Books, Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Sunday’s Sermon Today: Dirty Water Into Wine (John 2:1-11)

“Mawage. Mawage is wot bwings us togeder tooday. Mawage, that bwessed awangment, that dweam wifin a dweam…

And wuv, tru wuv, will fowow you foweva..…”

That’s how I started my sister’s wedding sermon (even after strong orders NOT to). It’s also the line from The Princess Bride for those of you who haven’t seen it. But it’s the kind of thing I’ve always wanted to say at a wedding, having sat through plenty of weddings as my wife’s date. The typical guy, I just wasn’t that into the pomp and circumstance of the moment.

And I wonder if that wasn’t Jesus in John 2:1-11. We see that a marriage was taking place in Cana in Galilee. We don’t know who was getting married but we know that Mary, Jesus’ mother, was there and that Jesus was invited, along with his disciples.

Seriously, was Jesus checking the time, seeing if it was time to go? Was he begrudging the busyness of having to be present because his mother had told him to show up? Or was he reveling in the moment, in the way that God was invoked at a time when a man and a woman were joining themselves together forever?

We may never know. But we do know that at some point before everyone was filled, that the groom who was responsible for the afterparty ran out of wine. And that Mary, the mother of God, felt like this was the appropriate moment for Jesus to get involved.

Kind of amusing thought, isn’t it? Jesus is at the wedding but he’s not officiating. But when the alcohol runs out, it’s 1-800-G-E-T-J-E-S-U. Mary, who had an angel appear to her and announce that her child would save people from his sins, and who discovered that he would be king, uses her motherly influence to push Jesus toward his first public miracle.

I remember the first thing I ever did at a wedding at my mother’s insistence: I was a junior groomsman at my cousin’s wedding. That’s possibly the most boring situation for a twelve-year-old boy. But I complied—it’s my mother!

Unfortunately, that wedding is even clearer to me than my own. Midway through the pastoral prayer, there’s a dull “thunk” offscreen on the wedding video. Told the night before to stand perfectly still, I did, and that “thunk” is my right cheek bouncing off of the clothed kneeling rail. I suffered a minor abrasion that was made up so that the pictures wouldn’t be damaged; the plant I knocked off its pedestal on the way down was irreparably damaged.

Back to another amusing moment in the mother-son exchange in Cana: Jesus says no without actually saying no, and Mary doesn’t verbally answer him, but tells the servants to listen to whatever he tells them.

It says that Jesus saw the six stone jars that the wedding guests had used to clean themselves for the wedding, washing their hands and feet, holding between 120-180 gallons of dirty water. And he tells them to fill the jars back up to the brim, and he sends some to the party planner to taste.

Now, just pause with me for a second: dirty water. I’ll admit it, I’m a clean freak, germaphobic. I don’t drink after anyone, wash my hands before eating, my clothes before wearing them. I worry about E. Coli outbreaks at waterparks (my wife won’t get into a hot tub but I’m definitely worse). And Jesus is taking first century, used, dirty, non-hypoallergenic, unsanitized water and using it?

That’s making new meaning to “ministry is messy.”

We don’t see that Jesus did anything to the water, touched it in any way, or said anything, but when the water-turned-to-wine was presented to the planner, he was amazed that the better wine had been saved for later. He knew that you usually got the crowd liquorred-up, and then introduced the less aged stuff when the partygoers were too drunk to notice.

So, there’s Jesus’ rather surprising first miracle. Not a feeding or a healing, but a party trick where he turned water into wine. Still, it’s enough that his being different was revealed to those who knew where the water had come from, and his disciples believed.

I think about the things I’ve learned about weddings from my own through the ones I’ve officiated.

1-  The wedding is just the beginning.

2-  The ketchup goes in the cabinet (not like the fridge like my mom says). Wait, technically, I learned that from eleven years of marriage, not the actual ceremony…

3-  A wedding shows off a lot about family dynamics, from the way its organized to the elements that are important.

4-  No matter how old or experienced, the groom is incredibly nervous. You haven’t seen the full picture of a wedding til you’ve seen the groom’s foot tapping like Thumper in the back room.

5-  Most people don’t recognize the hard work that they’re about to experience, but that’s ok. The wedding is only the beginning.

Let’s look at that for a minute. The wedding was what I thought was going to be the finish line, growing up. You got married and everything was happily ever after, right? I mean, seriously, that’s how it works in all the movies…. [Have you ever noticed how the movies end with a wedding and sitcoms go through what happens once the people have been married for a decade? Just saying.]

The thing is that weddings are the party and marriages are the covenant. Weddings are the launch and marriages are the orbiting around in space, trying to figure out how to eat space ice cream and manage the essentials in zero gravity.  Weddings are when the covenant gets signed and marriages are the place the covenant gets cashed.

The marriage covenant is a microcosm of what God created with Abram, and later fulfilled in the person of Jesus. It echoes the way that Jesus would later promise to love the church as his bride. It’s sometimes as a stretch for us to see that God would view all of us in our togetherness to be the bride to his groom, but it shows the way that God loves us.

Jesus knew about the covenant. He knew about the way that God had first made a covenant with Adam and Eve, which they had broken, and later with Abram. Here, God promised that he would care for Abraham and his descendants, while Abraham was agreeing to worship him as the one true God.

Which brings me to this disclaimer: I know that not every wedding is beautiful. I know that there are tragic wedding planners and poorly planned wedding cakes. I know that best men give terrible speeches and that sometimes, families make us wish they hadn’t been invited.

And I know that not all of our parents set good examples, and that sometimes, our own marriages don’t work out the way that we want them to.

But in this case, when we’re talking about the marriage covenant, we’re talking about the way that God planned it, for a man and a woman to be joined together, to work together, to support each other, to challenge each other.

So when we go back from the marriage covenant to the covenant between God and the church, we see that God really wants something more for us. Sure, church doesn’t always work the way its supposed to. Some of you have been burned by the way that churches treated you. You’ve been knocked around in abusive church relationships, and for that, I am truly sorry.

If you are someone who has perpetrated the misogynistic, hateful, segregationist side of church, I pray that you’d repent.

The truth is that God hasn’t given up on the church, whether it’s the wounded or those who have done the wounding.

Too often, the church we see in the paper or experience in shadowy church parking lot conversations is too often the addition of broken soul after broken soul. The church is often the collection, the hodge podge, of the worst of us. That’s what happens when the church focuses too much on what it can do and what it can be, and focuses less on what the church can be when it lets Christ be the focus.

When we get back to the basics, it comes back to the water in those jars, and the water in this (baptismal) bowl. We’re going to take time later to celebrate our baptisms, the ones we reflect on and the ones that are still to come.

If we, the church, would be who we are baptized to be, like Jesus, then the wedding covenant would end happily ever after. All of the brokenness of our pasts, the marriages, the relationships, the failed attempts to be who we were always meant to be, all of that is washed away. All of that is redeemed, cleaned off, made clean in the waters of baptism.

Which begs the question: is it more amazing that Jesus turned dirty dishwater into wine or that Jesus turned broken-down liars, cheats, and rage-filled gossips into the beauty of what the church can be, what the kingdom of God can be?

Maybe Mary was onto something. No matter the size of the miracle, Jesus had it in him. And no matter how dirty the water, Jesus finds a way to make it crystal clear. Frankly, that’s one more marriage lesson: we don’t always have our best or our first choice attitude to work with every time, but if Jesus is involved, it comes out smelling wonderfully (if you like the smell of wine).

Jesus holds up God’s side of the covenant: to be with his people, to care for them, and to provide them with a much richer future then they could ever imagine. But consider the ways that we agree through the baptismal covenant to fulfill our end of it, the way that the Methodist church articulates it:

We will faithfully participate in the ministries of the church by our prayers, our presence, our gifts, our service, and our witness, that in everything God may be glorified through Jesus Christ.

I didn’t make that up—it’s there in the hymnal. We, when we’re confirmed, or get baptized as adults, or join the church by transfer, agree that we will do these things.

We promise to participate: we will not sit on the sidelines but get in the game. We will not just show up and expect that someone else will get it done. We will not go through the motions but we will be engaged in the work of the covenant in these five ways:

Our prayers- Do you pray? Seems so basic, but most of us go through stretches of our faith where we don’t actually pray. Pretty ridiculous right? You’ve got the red phone, the Batphone line, straight to the all powerful being in the universe and you don’t talk to or listen to him? (Funny, we don’t always communicate as well as we should with each other, either.)

Our presence- We will be fully present (you need that one in marriage, too). When you’re not here, you’re not soaking in community, and worship, and discipleship… but other people aren’t being blessed by your work or your perspective.

Our gifts- (Gulp.) The preacher is about to talk about money. Ahhhh! Run! It says right there in our baptismal covenant that we will give to the church, that we will participate in the life of the church by giving back to God what is really his anyway.

Leonard Sweet told this story:

At graduation from a Christian college, two best friends made a covenant with one another: even though neither had any money, they pledged to practice tithing to the church every year for the rest of their lives. As time went on, one became a pastor, and the other became a successful entrepreneur. During the hard years the entrepreneur tithed one thousand dollars the year he earned ten thousand, ten thousand dollars the year he earned one hundred thousand, and one hundred thousand dollars the year he earned one million. But the year he earned six million dollars, he just could not write out that check for six hundred thousand dollars to the church. 

So he telephoned his pastor friend, long since having moved to another part of the country, and asked to see him. Walking into his study and joyously greeting his college buddy, the entrepreneur begged to be let out of the covenant. “This tithing business has to stop, bro. It was fine when my tithe was one thousand dollars, but I just cannot afford six hundred thousand dollars. Do you know how much money that is? You’ve got to do something, Reverend, to help me out of my bind.”

The pastor immediately knelt on the floor and prayed silently for a long, long while. “Are you praying that God will release me from our covenant to tithe?” the entrepreneur asked. “No,” said the pastor. “I am praying for God to reduce your income back to the level where one thousand dollars will be your tithe.”

Our service- We are better at this at times than at other things, but too often we’re willing to check it off as a “thing we do” than a “way we are.” When our service becomes a check on our to-do list instead of way we “love God and love others,” we’ve stopped actually serving. We’re doing business rather than loving God through the covenant. We’ve got to stay focused on the love we first felt.

And finally, there’s our witness- it’s been added into the covenant since our hymnals were printed (we’ll have to work on that)- but it’s the thing that’s sometimes hardest for us to wrap our minds around. We promise in our marriage covenant to share the good news of Jesus Christ with others, not just hoping that they’d notice how awesome we are but that we’d actually tell them! Which means we need to be inviting others to the wedding or baptism or church, right?

Ben Affleck said that marriage is hard work last year at the Oscars and got ripped by online columnists for days. I tend to agree. But marriage is a lot like our faith walk, too: it takes work. Certainly, God did the heavy lifting in the person of Jesus Christ by carrying the cross for us, leaving us the ways we can participate ourselves.

Participation. It seems so easy, but to do it, we’ve got to get up off the bench and get in the game. Who’s ready?

This sermon is for 9 a.m. on January 5 at Blandford United Methodist Church 

Posted in Pop Culture, Sermons, Theology | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Sunday’s Sermon Today: John 3:17 (John 3:1-21)

Nicodemus is the man who stands in as a father-figure to Jesus after Jesus dies on the cross. He, along with Joseph of Arimathea, is the one who claims the body of the hopes, dreams, and future of those who believe. He’s the one who has the body wrapped up, cared for, and placed in a tomb that the son of a carpenter never could’ve afforded, but that a ruling class Pharisee would’ve had in store for him at the end of his life.

Nicodemus is the one who honors Jesus in his death with the honor of a teacher, a rabbi, and an honored MVP.

But before Nicodemus was that guy, he was a fifth string running back. The kind of guy my dad called a “get back,” as in whenever that guy left the bench, the coach yelled, “get back here!” Nicodemus wasn’t “getting in the game.” He wasn’t engaged, but by his level of knowledge and probably some family status, he was a member of the Jewish ruling class, the Pharisees.

Now, Pharisees have invaded even Sunday School: a four-year-old was telling about the Bible story she heard in her Sunday school class. It was the story of Jesus healing the blind man. When she got to the part where the Pharisees questioned the healed man, she said, “Oh boy, were those ferris wheels jealous of Jesus!”

The Pharisees knew the Scriptural rules backward, forward, and upside down. They were empowered by their knowledge, by their ability to interpret the Scriptures in a way that made them right and made others wrong, by their education and stature that only they could achieve because they controlled who else would learn to read and communicate. They told everyone else what to do to be right with God, and made it about the doing, the work, the sacrifice. They made it a paint-by-numbers process that didn’t really save anyone, but kept them treading water.

It was scientific and grace free and ineffective.

Still, Nicodemus was different. He knew that there was something to this Jesus guy, and early on in John, he came to Jesus at night. Nicodemus is one of the top dogs; he’s THE MAN, and has all of the power a native could ask for as a member of an occupied nation. Yet he comes slinking up to this traveling rebel-rouser, this teacher of God who is unaccepted by the rest of the ruling class of religious leaders to ask him some questions.

That kind of sounds like Nicodemus is a little chicken doesn’t it? He knows that Jesus has something to share but he’s too afraid to be caught talking to an outcast, an outsider, and “unapproved” teacher.

And then he opens his mouth and he says, “WE know that you are a teacher from God.” Suddenly, we recognize that Nicodemus might be chicken but he’s the bravest of the chickens. He’s the one who’s unwilling to be caught during the day but willing to go in the middle of the night.

So there are people who want to know but don’t want to get caught and so they don’t seek at all.

And there are people who want to know but don’t want to expose their desire to know so they find another way.

Do you know anyone in either category? Do you know people who are convinced that this Jesus guy was onto something but they’re afraid, for whatever reason, to admit that maybe they should come to church or maybe they should check out Bible study or maybe when their family doesn’t agree, that somehow, they’re supposed to be here?

Maybe you’re related to someone like that. Maybe that someone is you.

The thing is, Nicodemus goes. And he claims that God is with Jesus because otherwise, Jesus wouldn’t be able to do what he does. We don’t exactly know where this is on the timeline of Jesus three-year-ministry, but we know Nicodemus has to have seen and heard some pretty cool stuff about Jesus.

Which, of course, in true Jesus fashion, he neither confirms or denies. But he cuts right to the root of Nicodemus’ problem and tells him: no one can be part of God’s plan without being born again.

Now, fundamentally, we know that you can’t actually be born twice. You can’t climb back into your mother’s womb. That’s some physics and biology combined (I passed both, but am an expert at neither). So, Jesus wasn’t talking literally, even though Nicodemus’ brain still hasn’t caught up to Jesus speed and terminology.

Jesus comes back to the higher, deeper meaning: you have to be baptized, spiritually and physically, to be part of the kingdom of God. Just to clarify: I don’t believe you don’t get “in” to heaven if you die believing in Jesus but no one sprinkled or immersed you. But to Nicodemus, Jesus knew that baptism was a sign of repentance, of turning away from who you were and what you did and turning to what God wanted for your life.

Jesus might as well have said: you can’t be with God until you repent. You can sacrifice all of the chickens and sheep you want but if your heart doesn’t change, you can’t be right in God’s eyes.

You can go to church. You can memorize the whole Bible. You can give all of the money you have. You can do all the mission trips available. But if you don’t actually turn away from the things that are holding you back, if you don’t actually grow to love others more than yourself, all of the stuff you do is just busy work. You’re still failing.

Nicodemus still “argues,” and I don’t mean that in a bad way. He’s still trying to get it. But Jesus basically teases him, he asks how anyone else is going to understand if a guy with the Jewish PhD doesn’t get it. And if Nicodemus doesn’t understand repentance, which John the Baptist has been screaming about in the desert for years, then how is he going to get salvation? Because repentance to the Jews was not getting blasted while salvation through Jesus was about receiving so much more.

So Jesus breaks it down in a way that some crazed Raiders fan gets it, or at least thinks he does, at every football game: John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

Yay! Yee-haw! Right? Of course, we’ve oversimplified this today, but Jesus was explaining, per John’s narrative, that God loved the world (which we’re often taught is so corrupted and evil that it has to blow up at the end of time to make God happy) that he sent his son. That God “gave” his son as a gift so that there would not be perishing but eternal life.

All well and good, and perfectly lovely. Absolutely one of the “nicest,” safest, most universally smiled upon verses in the whole Bible. But just like everything else, it gets prooftexted, it gets used by those who want to read what they want to, into something else.

It’s like we read “perish” and some people go, “ohhhhh” and start pointing fingers, thinking about all the people who are going to perish! But that’s not what it says there.

KEEP READING.

John 3:17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.  (Emphasis mine. I’ve always wanted to say that!…)

The writer of John goes out of his way to specifically say that Jesus was not sent to condemn the world. Granted, the world stood condemned because of the law, because who can’t not break the law? (No one.) The world already stood condemned. But for all the people, like Nicodemus, who had been raised in a climate where the rules were everything, John made sure that he included that Jesus said he wasn’t there to blast anyone, but to save the world.

The whole world. Read it again.

John 3:17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.  

Just in case you think I’m going “soft” on the idea that Jesus’ purpose was one of salvation, let me be clear: I don’t think that salvation can be found anywhere but in the death and resurrection of God’s only son, Jesus Christ. I think that’s pretty clear from verse 18: “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.”

They’re not condemned because God is out to get them, but because of what the law says about sin and judgment throughout the Old Testament, Jesus is the only way they, we, can be made right.

The law says, you die because of this, and that, and this.

God sends Jesus to die on your behalf.

You believe, and suddenly, the law is playing second fiddle to grace.

That’s the beauty of John 3:16-17. But don’t miss the context.

Jesus says this to a man who comes seeking because he’s braver than his friends, because he knows Jesus is onto something, because he wants to have what Jesus does. Nicodemus comes searching for something and Jesus offers him salvation.

I don’t know where you are in your process. Are you passed worrying about what others think? Are you still struggling with the expectations of the legalistic roots of our Protestant faith? Are you fully engaged in Bible study and exploring the Scripture so that you can better understand the good news Jesus shared with Nicodemus?

Today, I encourage you to repent. To turn from the things that hold you back and lay claim to the salvation that Jesus offers you. Salvation from your sins, from yourself, from the dangerous “this is the one way to do it” theology of our churches.

John Wesley wrote this covenant renewal, and I leave it with you to consider:

I am no longer my own, but yours

Put me to what you will, rank me with whom you will,

Put me to doing, put me to suffering.

Let me be employed by you or laid aside by you,

Exalted for you or brought low for you.

Let me be full, let me be empty.

Let me have all things, let me have nothing.

I freely and heartily yield all things to your pleasure and disposal.

And now, oh glorious and blessed God,

Father, Son, and Holy Spirit,

You are mine, and I am yours. So be it.

And the covenant which we have made on earth,

let it be ratified in heaven. Amen.

This sermon is for January 5 at 11 a.m. at Blandford United Methodist Church.

Posted in Sermons | Leave a comment

My “Best Of What I Saw” 2013 Version

By my count, I saw 38 films in 2013, plus over a hundred DVDs and several dozen TV shows. Of course, not all of them are created equal, and here’s my wrap up of what was actually worth catching!

Best in Film:

Frozen: This is my favorite movie of the year, and my favorite Disney film in a decade. Sure, Brave had amazing animation and Wreck-It Ralph was clever, but taking Hans Christian Anderson’s fairytale and spinning it out with Olaf the talking snowman, and a pair of dueling sisters, was in fact epic. With several twists, it turns the expectations of story on its head, with music and dazzling animation, even while retelling an old, old story. I can’t wait to see it again.

12 Years A Slave: Vying with Prisoners for “Toughest Film I Watched This Year,” Chiwetel Ejiofor dominates this flick with his tough, yet tender, presentation of a freed black man who finds himself kidnapped and sold into slavery in the 1800s. Brutally graphic, we see the dynamics of slavery, and it sickens us, even while we recognize that women and children around the world are trafficked today. It’s a warning about how we justify our actions, and what we should be doing to end what’s going on today. (Other Oscar potentials I’ve seen: American Hustle, Rush, Captain Phillips.)

The Lone Ranger (now on Blu-ray/DVD): Panned by critics, this one tells an old story in a 21st century way. He’s no Clayton Moore, but Artie Hammer is the perfect foil for Johnny Depp’s Tonto. William Fichtner plays evil to the core, while Tom Wilkinson fills in admirably to provide gravitas. The bond between the two justice-filled fighters was just what this summer needed. Hopefully, Depp & Gore Verbinski get another shot together.

Elysium (now Blu-ray/DVD): Neil Blomkamp plus Matt Damon seemed like a no-brainer. District 9 is still one of the best science fiction films I’ve ever seen. Elysium might not have been that good, but it shone a light on privilege, healthcare, wealth, and personal redemption. In the process, it found a Christ figure in the midst of the CGI and sci-fi, allowing us to be entertained while seeing a way that maybe, just maybe, the filmmaker was talking about our lives.

Man Of Steel (now on Blu-ray/DVD): While I genuinely enjoyed Iron Man 3 and it led my early rankings of superhero flicks, rewatching the Henry Cavill version of Superman in high definition allowed me to see its more redeemable qualities. While IM3 takes Tony Stark out of the suit, MoS allows us to see more Clark Kent and less of the alien crime fighter. We get to see the people who have destiny and responsibility forced on them, and it allows it to be humanized in a way that sometimes, previous movies failed. And then there’s Supes’ epic, “is that the only choice?” decision that will launch a serious conversation about situational ethics if you’re willing.

Best in Shows:

Chicago Fire: We binge watched the first season and then dove into it. It hasn’t disappointed in terms of relational issues, on-the-job educations, and a front seat to situations that first responders encounter everyday. Cheesy? Yes, at times, but it’s must-watch television.

Scandal: While I came late to this one, I’m now “live,” having watched the first two seasons and the 2013-14 shows-to-date since October 1. While the first season (a mere 12 episodes) was the mightiest, this show still continues to make me want to see what happens. No one is black as night or white as day, but everyone has a real-wrold shade of gray.

The Bible: Somehow, lightning in a bottle happened, and we found ourselves tweeting, huddling up at work, and answering questions from non-religious corners of our world, where people wanted to know, “did that really happen that way?”

Best in SportsYes, I’m biased but the Red Sox run from worst-to-first was pretty epic, especially given the impact of Sandyhook and the Boston Marathon bombings on the New England community. You can relive the magic (I know I will) on Blu-ray, but watching the games, and hearing sports figures actually talk about their feelings (David Ortiz, come on down!) made for an experience of sports that was more than just an “event.”

What’s the best of what you saw this year? What would you go back and rewatch? What made you stop and think?

Posted in Current Events, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Sports, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment