@JoeFinder Suspicion: The Slippery Slope (Book Review)

Joseph Finder’s previous ten novels have landed him on the New York Times Bestseller list, and credited in two movies (ParanoiaHigh Crimes). His latest, Suspicion, has the earmarks of a thriller coming to a cineplex near you, as an average Joe writer, Danny, finds himself in deep in a war between the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Mexican cartels. Like Dwayne Johnson’s Snitch, the story takes the mundane, a budding friendship between Danny’s daughter and another girl, and transforms it into a continent-wide adventure from the city of Boston to Aspen and back again.

Widower Danny Goodman’s adventure begins, as Finder writes, “with a quick handshake and a friendly smile.” His daughter, Abby, is enrolled in a snooty private school, but secretly, his income has dried up as his writing inspiration goes dim. Not only can’t he pay for the school trip abroad, but he lacks the means to pay the current tuition.

Enter Tom Galvin, with a forceful offer of substantial money that Danny desperately needs, all in return for Abby’s continued friendship with Galvin’s daughter, Jenna. Sure, it’s enough to shame Goodman, but he doesn’t really have a choice, if he doesn’t want to deny his daughter her dream.

So far, there’s not much to see here, right? But if you’ve read enough of these types of stories or watched television, you know there will be “the catch.”

The catch comes in the form of two shadowy agents who announce that Danny must keep tabs on Galvin, providing them information, pictures, etc. unless he wants to be brought up on charges. Galvin is an American money launderer for a Mexican drug cartel, and the DEA  is after him. Danny refuses, seeks legal counsel, and finally, faced with no other options, agrees in various stages to spy on Galvin. It only gets worse from there.

Imagine yourself, a regular joe, thrown out of your element into a world where everything seems stacked against you, you don’t know who to trust, and your family is all you have left. What will you do? What lines would you cross? What would you do to get your life back?

Finder’s writing is quick, witty, and exciting. The tension for the reader builds, palpably, even as the playing field is constantly shifting. Who is trustworthy? Who is not? Who is good, who is bad, and who is…stuck somewhere in the middle? We want Goodman to extricate himself from his predicament; we want there to be justice for him in the face of the situation where he’s really done nothing morally wrong. But we’re kept unbalanced, and we don’t know until the very end who will survive and who will fall.

We have our suspicions.

Posted in Books, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Memorial Day Can Teach The Church (A Mustard Seed Musing)

Imagine if today was just about the cookout. The crushed soda cans. The burgers. The football-throwing. Wait, imagine for a second that it’s just about the day off. The opportunity to sleep in. To not get dressed for work or make the drive in to “the grind.” Imagine if all it did was signify that ‘summer’ was here. Would that really be a “memorial day?”

I doubt it.

No, Memorial Day is about remembering those who have fallen in the service of the United States, those who protect our freedom (I argue) both home and abroad as members of the Armed Forces, the state and local police, the professional and paid firefighters. Those who allow you and I to go about our business and enjoy the freedoms of drinking Coke (or Pepsi), eating the meat we like, meeting with the people we want to, and even worshipping in the places of worship we choose to Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. We remember their sacrifice, their work, their commitment on our part. If we just take the day off, we diminish what those folks have sacrificed. If we don’t take our freedom seriously, if we abuse it or if we ignore it, we diminish what they’ve done.

Which brings me to church.

Yesterday, I preached on “Word #4,” on keeping the Sabbath. For the most part, we’ve diminished it to an hour, usually 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. Sunday. But re-read this elaboration on the Sabbath from Deuteronomy 5:12-15: “Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the Lord your God has commanded you. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.

There’s nothing there about a token acknowledgment, a “thanks for that day off this week,” a checking off of the box marked “I went to church.” No, there’s a reminder that God brought us up out of slavery, the Israelites from Egypt and Christians from sin, and we’re supposed to remember, celebrate, and be changed.

Whoa, where’s the ‘be changed’ part?

When the Israelites celebrated Sabbath, they were called to treat the sons, daughters, servants, animals, and foreigners in the same way they treated themselves.

When the Israelites celebrated Sabbath, they were to change the social and economic conditions.

If you change on Sunday [not, if you check off the box, but if you change], then don’t you think the other six days of the week should be different, too?

Today, this week, this lifetime, I hope you thank a veteran, buy a meal for someone in the service, in fire, rescue, or police. I hope you take a moment and thank God for the fact that those people do what you can’t do for yourself: allow your freedom to exist. And I hope, in thanking God, you recognize in those moments that God has made you free in a completely different, all-encompassing, eternal way: from your sin, and your shame, and the things that keep you ‘stuck.’

Happy Memorial Day, y’all. We didn’t earn it, but we receive it thanks to the grace of others… and the Other.

 

Posted in Pop Culture, Theology | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blended: Looking For Love (Again) (Movie Review)

The third collaboration of Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore is laugh out loud funny… as proved by a raucous theater of multigenerational couples today. Having hit well with The Wedding Singer (my favorite Adam Sandler movie*) and 50 First Dates, the couple returns as the widowed Jim Friedman and the recently divorced Lauren Reynolds. [They also team up again with Sandler’s sometime director, Frank Coraci.] What happens is funny (I know that puts me in the minority of critics) but it’s also poignant.

Jim and Lauren don’t hit it off on their blind date at Hooters. We know they won’t. Just like we know that each of them will have to blow it once at making things work (he will on their mixed-up trip to South Africa; “she” will thanks to her ex-husband (Joel McHale)) because that’s what happens in romantic comedies. No, this isn’t overtly genius or original, but it’s funny, it’s engaging, and Sandler and Barrymore have real chemistry (check out their Jimmy Fallon interview from a month or so ago).

Of course, the growing list of “regular participants” parades through, including Terry Crews, Kevin Nealon, Dan Patrick, Shaquille O’Neal, and Allen Covert. The music is always fitting (especially a several song montage), the humor is both clever in wordplay and slapstick physically, and the settings, mostly Africa, are wonderful. From a romantic comedy perspective, this is about as good as it gets, staying on the sunny side of PG-13 while pushing a few boundaries when possible.

But looking for love again in your forties, or not looking but needing something more from life, has to be hard. While there is significant laughter to be had here, some of which may require you to be a parent or divorced or… not, there’s also a lesson about learning to trust again and consider what your children are getting into when you date. [Trust me, the movie is funny, but it’s about to get real right here.]

Jim’s eldest (Bella Thorne) has been raised to be an athlete not be a lady (a la the youngest girl on Last Man Standing); the middle one (Emma Fuhrmann) leaves seats open for her deceased mother to sit in so that she doesn’t ‘lose’ her; the youngest one (Alvia Alyn Lind) doesn’t know any different, but thinks having a woman around feels pretty good. Lauren’s eldest (Zak Henri) struggles with his crush on the babysitter and a growing interest in skin magazines; her youngest (Kyle Silverstein) longs to be competitive but hasn’t had anyone teach him or instruct him on the art of losing well. All of these are real issues, real ways that children who’ve experienced their family break up. And Blended doesn’t skate around them.

Somewhere in the midst of the third act, I thought of a friend of mine who lost his wife in the last few years. I thought of his children and the way they only had him to turn to for both nurture and discipline, tough and soft love. I know he’s been seeing someone but I know that transition has been hard for him. I know there have to have been some awkward talks, with his potential date and his children, but that the new relationship was meant to do something new, not replace his first wife. Blended aims to hit funny and show us how love might find us again, sometimes unexpectedly and sometimes awkwardly, sometimes when we’re not looking for it and sometimes where we’re sure it won’t find us.

Sandler’s latest hits hilarious and poignant, proving underneath all of that craziness is a heart that’s still exploring how love finds us, how family works, and what it means to explore this spectacularly absurd thing called parenthood. Blended isn’t for everyone but it worked for me.

*[For the record, I rank Sandler’s top half-dozen this way: Wedding Singer, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy, Billy Madison, Blended, and Mr. Deeds.]

 

Posted in Current Events, Movie Reviews, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

X-Men Days Of Future Past: Stumble Into Hope (Movie Review)

The present world of the X-Men (2023) is desolate, and life has been delineated between mutants (and those humans who support them) and the rest of humanity. Giant, adaptable Sentinels (artificial intelligent robots) hunt and destroy all of the mutants they can find. As a last ditch effort, Professor X (Stewart) and Magneto (McKellan) use Kitty Pryde (Page) to send Wolverine’s (Jackman) consciousness into ‘young Logan’ in 1973. It’s up to him to unite young Xavier (McAvoy) and Magneto (Fassbender) so that they can stop Raven/Mystique (Lawrence) from killing the Sentinel creator, Bolivar Trask (Dinklage), and loosing violent anti-Mutant sentiment.

Based on Chris Claremont and John Byrne’s X-Men run in the early 1980s, and directed by X-Men and X-Men 2 director Bryan Singer (also… Superman Returns), the film is in the darker vein of X-Men: First Class, based in a realistic world where the Cuban Missile Crisis has been averted but the lingering effects of the Vietnam War remain. Wolverine proves again to be the most central character or “glue,” which makes sense given FOX’s success with the Wolverine spinoffs and Jackman’s star power. But here, he’s the conduit that provides an opportunity for Xavier and Magneto to make world-shaping decisions, and allows others, like Beast (Hoult) and Mystique to make their mark on history.

What follows isn’t as insidiously evil on screen as Kevin Bacon’s Sebastian Shaw, but it’s more intent in exposing the way that we think and relate to one another. We meet the young William Stryker (Josh Helman) who will grow up to torment Wolverine as the head of Weapon X, and we see the aftermath of Trask’s dissection of an array of dead mutants (from the Hellfire club, circa First Class). That is the main visible sign that Trask isn’t just intent on protecting humans from mutants he doesn’t understand but that he sees the mutants as less-than-human, lab rats to be studied so that humanity itself could be improved, whatever the cost.

We’re faced with two sets of competing and parallel psychological developments. The first revolves around Xavier and whether or not he will give up and remain in the shadows, nursing the wounds of what he’s lost (see First Class again), or whether he will take a more proactive approach to using his gifts for good in the world. It’s a similar question raised by various superhero movies, the most recently by Amazing Spider-Man 2. But it’s most shocking here because of the sense of will and emotional power that’s been displayed all along by ‘old’ Xavier thanks to Stewart. Thankfully, Wolverine is enough to jog Xavier out of his pity tea party.

The second scenario revolves around the Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique/Raven triangle. We see that Lawrence’s blue woman is caught between the peace/defense view of Xavier and the war/attack/conquer of Magneto. All three of them have been dealt series blows by humanity, but while Raven can hide, she can never truly be accepted by the humans as one of them thanks to the color of her skin. [This raises another point about the social/psychological agenda of the X-men from comics to film: the way that the X-Men stand in as a parabolic ‘other’ in our conversations about race, class, etc. Some see this as a pro-homosexuality argument, but the way that many of the mutants cannot hide their mutations makes racism the most obvious comparison.] This war of points of view comes to a head (again) by the end of the movie, but it’s always interesting when we’re set up to believe that there are two sides to something… and learn that there are various subsets to the various sides. Xavier and Magneto may be the extremes but their followers, from Wolverine to Raven to Beast, all fall at different places on the spectrum.

All of this seems to come to a head in a soliloquy between the old and new Xaviers. We know what the X-crew in 1973 will do because of their conversation: there’s a recognition that just because someone stumbles (i.e. doesn’t act the way they should) doesn’t mean that they are beyond hope or can’t be redeemed. It’s so blatantly spelled out for us in the course of the movie that it’s impossible to miss: Raven can be redeemed somewhat immediately, but so can Magneto. It’s an interesting additional point to the ‘parable’ of the X-Men: how would our worlds be different if we believed that no one was without hope or beyond saving?

There’s a parallel scene around Cerebro where Wolverine ‘reignites’ old Xavier’s hope, and the power comes back on. It’s a reminder that when we have hope, we’ll run through walls, dream the impossible, strive to be better than we believed we could be. The opposite, despair, tells us that there’s nothing that can be done, that the future is written out, played out, broken … before we even get there. It says that this is all there is so why bother? Unfortunately, people of faith often fall into that trap, and rather than working to improve the world they live in (an ark motif), they settle for waiting for ‘end times’ to hurry up and get here (lifeboat motif). In 2 Corinthians 4:16-18, it says “Therefore we do not lose heart. Though outwardly we are wasting away, yet inwardly we are being renewed day by day. For our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all. So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” The future Xavier did not give up hope (Dumb & Dumber: “so you’re saying there’s a chance?”) and that allows the old Xavier to save the future.

“And this hope will not lead to disappointment” (Romans 5:5).

Posted in Current Events, Movie Reviews, Reviews, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Angriest Man In Brooklyn: Finding Our Joy (Movie Review)

“Anger is my refuge, my shield, my birthright.”–Henry Altmann

All of us have had bad days; some of us have bad lies. It’s not necessarily because everything goes wrong, but because of how we handle it or receive it. It’s the classic case of half-empty or half-full. Henry Altmann (Robin Williams) has lost the joy of his life thanks to the death of one of his sons, and he’s spent the time since being angry at the world. He’s bitterly angry at perceived slights, confrontations, and the unexpected diagnosis of a brain aneurysm that he receives from his accidental doctor, Sharon (Mila Kunis), who isn’t have such a great life herself. When their worlds collide, the results are entertaining, moving, and applicable to our lives.

Henry’s diagnosis as he understands it, that he has ninety minutes to live, sends him on a journey to reconcile with his wife (Melissa Leo), with his ballroom dancing son (Hamish Linklater, who appears in Williams’ TV show, The Crazy Ones), with his brother (Game of Thrones’ Peter Dinklage), and with others he’s harmed along the way. It parallels Sharon’s own come-to-Jesus hour and a half, as she realizes that she used to love medicine and her patients, and now she hides from her life in medicine and by pushing her patients through the system.

In one of the more interesting moments in the film, Henry videotapes himself, a final testament of his love for his son. He becomes angrier and angrier as he speaks, finally screaming into the camera, “how could there be a god?” It’s telling, this parable wrapped around a bad day in Brooklyn because it ultimately becomes director Phil Alden Robinson’s (Field of Dreams, Sum of All Fears) testament to how we get lost inside our grief, and how we fail to recognize the moments where we experience joy. It’s a reminder that too often we give ourselves the credit when we succeed but we blame God when things go wrong. Instead, we need to see the beauty of what God has given us, and recognize that in our pain, suffering, and grief, that God cries, too.

In the end, Henry and Sharon save each other in a darkly comic tale about losing oneself in the city and finding oneself in the midst of community. It’s beautiful and deep, and it highlights one of life’s greatest truths: we need each other.

Posted in Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

X-Men Rewind: A Parable Of Society (Movie Review)

With the seventh X-Men feature releasing tomorrow, I’ve been reviewing the previously-released elements of the cinematic mythology. It’s hard not to draw from the various comic books, television shows, etc. but I’ve tried to keep it limited to what the films have actually shown us of the elite force of mutants who defend the world from tyranny and various “isms.” There’s still plenty here to reflect on thanks to the vision of directors like Bryan Singer and Matthew Vaughn, as well as the original creation by Jack Kirby, Stan Lee, Chris Claremont, and Joss Whedon.

The Back Story

In the first film in the series, we watch as Professor X (Patrick Stewart) and Magneto (Ian McKellan) draw up battle lines (and teams) to reckon with the growing discontent between humans and mutants (human beings with special powers). There’s a grand culmination at the Tower of Liberty, and we’re wowed by the special effects and elaborate cast (Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry, Famke Janssen, Anna Paquin), but ultimately, we enter into some territory that’s a bit too hokey.

By X2: X-Men United and X-men: The Stand, we’re dealing with prejudice that is palpable hate in the form of William Stryker (Brian Cox, NOT Daddy Warbucks) and then, the absolute clash of Xavier and Magneto, revolving around Jean Grey (Famke Janssen) who must contend with the Dark Phoenix. Unfortunately, the storyline is a bit muddled because they try for the stories of Claremont, Whedon, and some old school Kirby/Lee all mashed together. It almost begs for a reboot…

Which is what we get after the sideways step to X-Men Origins: Wolverine that does nearly nothing for the development of the X-Men mythos, but makes Jackman even more front and center as Wolverine. Somehow, we’ve lost the sense of the X-Men battling humanity and other, more violent mutants, instead sending Wolvie on a revenge adventure (that’s akin to the comics) with way too much cheesiness mixed in thanks to comic-killing Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool (not to be confused with Arrow’s Deadshot). [Origins is bad enough that some people swear off of Wolverine (2013) but that film proves to be more true to Wolverine in another adaptation of a Claremont storyline.]

It Gets Better…

X-Men: First Class finally provides us with a solid story that gives us the motivations and ‘theology’ of Xavier (Jams McAvoy) and Magneto (Michael Fassbender). We watch the first school Xavier tries to set up with Magneto, training a younger crowd of mutants like Mystique, Beast, Alex “Havok” Summers (Cyclop’s brother) played by younger actors (Jennifer Lawrence, Nicholas Hoult, Lucas Till, Caleb Landry Jones). But the other piece, besides younger, is that the story takes us back to the early 1960s, and finds us recognizing why those two stanchions in all of the stories are the way they are, how they lost the friendship they once had.

I find the stories relating to Nazis to be gripping, whether it’s real like The Diary of Anne Frank or fictional like Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark. These animals, these possessed power-coveting annihilists serve up the drive that causes Magneto to be angry, that cause Mystique (Lawrence) to question her place in a society that doesn’t accept mutants and especially ones that look like Smurfs. But Xavier experiences the ‘racism’ and ostracization and doesn’t allow his anger to get the best of him.

In one of the best theological scenes, X challenges Magneto to get past the anger to do something better. That just stopping bullets from hitting his brain isn’t enough but that he needs to control his powers to use them intentionally, focused. That there are two natures within all of us and that we need to figure out what we should control and what we should embrace. Good versus evil, self versus community, power versus servanthood. It’s a series of decisions that aren’t just Xavier’s and Magneto’s but every single one of the mutants in X-Men: First Class, like Kevin Bacon’s Sebastian Shaw.

For me, the power-hungry violence of the Hellfire Club makes the latest X-Men film until tomorrow more gritty and realistic in the fight between the X-Men and the other mutants. Sure, it’s a coming-of-age story, a love story (between Beast and Mystique), and a recognition that what may seem like a two-sided battle later on between Xavier and Magneto, is really not. It’s various shades of gray, of decision-making, of freeing oneself up for the community or binding ourselves to a narrow, self-focused vision of how the world works.

Here, it’s not just “with great power comes responsibility,” but rather a series of questions about whether or not we use our powers to benefit ourselves or we share them so that we can be a blessing to everyone. Violence, greed, revenge, hate, etc. are all options for the mutants, and for us, but determining who we follow and how we combat things, violently or non-violently, are incredibly important in how we’re defined and remembered. Recognizing our own Godgiven gifts or hiding them because of others’ attention, scorn, or fear doesn’t help us make good choices on the larger level. There are plenty of other sociological perspectives that the films offer, but the choices we make and how they impact others are sure to rise again in Singer’s adaption of Claremont’s X-Men: Days of Future Past.

Can we change the future by making the right decisions?

Posted in Books, Comics, Current Events, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture, Reviews, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Batman Zero Year- Secret City: A Reluctant Bruce Wayne (Book Review)

Sure, this is about Batman, but this is even more about Bruce Wayne. Before Gotham arrives on your television this fall!

The origin of Batman has been told before. Whether it’s Tim Burton or Christopher Nolan on the big screen, or Frank Miller, Geoff Johns, Grant Morrison, or Greg Pak. So, I almost cringed when I opened my latest Scott Snyder Batman graphic novel and discovered… he was writing an extensive Batman origin story. Really, another one? But I should’ve known better. This is Scott Snyder, who has taken his American Vampire success and parlayed it into an epic Batman run complete with a Court of Owls, old villains in a new way, and a must-have run of Batman stories. This is an origin story unlike anything we’ve seen before.

After the long, expected adolescent-to-adulthood absence (which has colorful vignettes displayed in an assortment after the main story), Bruce Wayne returns to Gotham and his childhood caregiver, Alfred Pennyworth. But in opposition to Alfred’s advice, he wants nothing to do with Bruce Wayne. His anonymous crime fighter looks more like Matches Malone than it does the Dark Knight, and he refuses to announce his return “socially” as Wayne, eschewing life in Wayne Manor for a townhouse on Crime Alley.

What emerges is a mystery that rivals Detective Comics, as our crime fighter finds himself up against the Red Hood gang, and matching wits separately (parallel?) with Edward Nygma. He’s trying to figure out who he is, and what role he should play in his dual lives. It’s the opposite of Christian Bale’s Batman or Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man: he has to recognize that as a pillar of the community, that he has an obligation to take leadership responsibility as Bruce Wayne. Yes, Batman is epic and important, but Snyder’s story seems to imply that all of us have a moral, civic responsibility to stand up and be counted where we are.

While I found the stories to be clever twists on my old favorites, I found the art by Greg Capullo to be just as fantastic. I can appreciate a lukewarm story with good art, but this is good art that tells a story. Images of the bat, hints at developments in the story later (Nygma’s cane in shadows, etc.), are mixed with clues in the text that foreshadow the way the story will unravel. This deserves to be purchased, read and re-read, both to see the development of a hero’s psyche and the story of the rebirth of a city. This is the story of a community terrorized by evil, corrupted by fear, that makes a recovery because a good man refuses to do nothing.

Fans of heroes, of art, of comics, of the Dark Knight need to borrow, beg, … they must read this. Before Zero Year Dark City arrives in October!

Posted in Books, Comics, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

@Haleycampbelly The Art of @Neilhimself : The Growth Of The Artist (Book Review)

You might be fooled into thinking that the oversized, full-color look at Neil Gaiman’s art history (and writing) was just that, a history of art. But a closer examination of the book reveals that the author of American Gods and the mind behind Neverwhere, Stardust, and Coraline has in fact been thoughtfully creating a mystique and a mythology since … he was three or four.

Pulling on Gaiman’s own recollection of events, interviews from publications that he wrote for and was written about by, and the works of Gaiman himself, Hayley Campbell turns her own admiration for Gaiman’s work into a full-on biography of sorts, sharing facts, philosophy, and art along the way. While my “Gaiman exposure” is severely limited (I’ve seen Stardust but have touched a mere fragment of the written and drawn collection), the biography aspects were intriguing enough to make me go scrambling for what I might put my hands on. The selection of factual tidbits from his childhood to his early journalism to his relationship to Alan Moore to his success in novels, graphic novels, and film… it’s all here.

Yes, Gaiman is English, but his exploration of American life is insightful (in the same way that Ireland’s John Connolly has fairly critiqued New England life in his books). His examination of fables, myths, and our various ‘truths’ leads itself to some dark, deep stuff that will stretch your mind and make you think. That’s right, in a world where artistic expression by way of frames, thought bubbles, and illustrations (comics, people!) are often derided as being for children or young fanboys at best, Gaiman creates a mythology based on his own experience, not just the standard worlds of DC and Marvel. He makes me want to write a comic!

But I’ve dwelled fully on Gaiman the creator, artist, man, and thinker; the truth is that it’s Campbell’s ability to share the thoughts, quirks, and meanings of Gaiman in a way that makes even the initiated interested that’s a real gift in its own right. Maybe one day we’ll be reading her biography put to art; it bears noting that Gaiman himself started writing on ‘fact’ and after defining the method, switched to transporting his own inner thoughts to fiction. It’s a reminder to all of us would-be writers: the best way to become a writer is to write and keep writing.

Posted in Books, Pop Culture, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ten Words #4: Just Breathe

“Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.”–Exodus 20:8-11

What do you hear when you hear the Fourth Word? Do you hear, “it’s time for a nap” or something more judgmental, like “why didn’t you go to church last week?”

I believe that it begins with our understanding of the difference between work, that fulfilling and meaningful purpose we’re given, and what the Bible calls “toil” (but which I probably would call “the grind.”) It’s clearly distinguished in the Old Testament, as early as Genesis 3:17.

Adam’s work in the Garden of Eden went from his Godgiven, blessed work, naming the animals and caring for them, to this: “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.” It’s not that Adam didn’t have work before sin, but after sin, his work became hard.

It’s notable that it’s not until Exodus, when Moses receives God’s Ten Most Important Words for the people, that this idea of rest gets mentioned. But God does command it, making it important. It made it into the top ten, right? But what is God really pushing for here? We know it’s the representation of the day that the Creator God rested on the seventh day after creating the world, but it doesn’t look like it’s just about remembering the moment like a weekly birthday party…It’s about recognizing that because they are no longer slaves, they don’t have to work all the time!

Turning to Exodus 16, where the Israelites are wandering around, we see that they don’t get this differentiation about Sabbath. They are programmed to think that they should work all the time. They are programmed to a pace of life that doesn’t expect peace, doesn’t expect a break. They wish that God had killed them in Egypt, because there they had food. We’ve seen this before: better to slave away and suffer with what you know than to have faith in God’s ability to give enough, to provide what they need. God rains down manna from heaven for them, special food that appears miraculously, and still they hoard it. Their lack of contentedness keeps them from understanding Sabbath, from experiencing the peace of God’s favor.

In Exodus 31:13-16, God tells Moses again that it’s important to keep the Sabbath. “This will be a sign between me and you for the generations to come, so you may know that I am the Lord, who makes you holy.” It’s by observing the Sabbath that God will know the Israelites are on board. Moses interpreted that to mean that if you didn’t observe the Sabbath, you’d be put to death because their non-Sabbath-keeping was a threat to the community. It’s a sign of the Israelites acceptance of the covenant– we don’t make vows to a proposition but a person when we get married– it’s a marriage to another person. At the same time, when we’re making a covenant or starting something new, don’t we fair better with incentives or the opposite of an incentive? That’s why we exercise more when we have a partner, why we lose weight, or fight an addiction, better when we do it in a group, with accountability.

Later, in Deuteronomy 5:14-15, Moses shares with the people of Israel an elaboration on the Fourth Word: “but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm. Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.”

Wait. This just got REAL and really quickly. This isn’t just, stop and have a prayer, head to church and check it off your list. No, this is economic and social and somehow, about ‘loving your neighbor as yourself.’

Moses says that not only are the adults, and their children not to work, but it is literally a work stoppage for the servants and the slaves, too. It’s extended to the foreigners who are protected by the rules about hospitality, who are extended the same rights as the Israelites themselves.

In the film Lone Survivor, Marcus Luttrell (as played by Mark Wahlberg) is outgunned, outmanned, and left to die in Afghanistan. But he discovers something that I believe is deeper than “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” He stumbles into an Afghan village that holds to the code of Pashtunwali: a stranger must be taken in, cared for, and even defended. [Sidebar: Can you imagine the story of the town that directed its occupants to defend a Taliban bomber because of its hospitality values? Think back to the backlash toward where Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsaernav would be buried after bombing the Boston Marathon!]

But that’s how the Sabbath as translated in Deuteronomy gets extended into hospitality. Hebrews 13:2: “Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some people have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it.” That’s how Abraham and Sarah got pregnant– no pressure!

Of course, we don’t have servants; heck, most of us don’t own animals [my dog is worthless from that point of view!] So, let’s consider the Sabbath through the Jesus lens. In Luke 4:14-21, Jesus is doing his thing, preaching and teaching and drawing attention of those in need, and those with a need to criticize. At what we think was his first public preaching engagement, he stood up on the Sabbath, turned to Isaiah, and read, “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
 because he has anointed me
 to proclaim good news to the poor.
 He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
  and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” And then he told those gathered to worship that he was fulfilling it.

In Mark 12, Jesus draws the attention of those critics again, when he heals a man with a crippled hand, gasp, on the Sabbath.” “[The critics] questioned Jesus, asking, ‘Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?’—so that they might accuse Him. And He said to them, “What man is there among you who has a sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will he not take hold of it and lift it out? How much more valuable then is a man than a sheep! So then, it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.” And that’s when he healed the man.

The Sabbath, mentioned one hundred and forty-seven times in the Old and New Testaments, shares something with humanity about the way that God sees us and the way that God understands our needs for ourselves and our community. But maybe, we don’t quite get it.

Sure, with work schedules, our Sundays are not the same, but that doesn’t mean that we can’t keep the Sabbath. Sure, technology doesn’t allow the same boundaries of work and play, but that doesn’t mean we still don’t need Sabbath. More than fifty percent of Americans don’t take a vacation, but that doesn’t mean they don’t need one!

We’ve gotten the American Work Ethic so banged into our heads that we worry more about what our boss thinks than what our spouse does. We stress over what we need to get done and whether we’ve done enough to the detriment of our health, our happiness, our wellbeing. Sure, the extreme opposite is laziness, but we’ve gotten so far past that they we hardly need to worry!

Can you imagine the AME if it included the caveat that “if you don’t observe the Sabbath, you’ll be put to death?” Wonder how many folks on Wall Street would take their first vacation, their first day off in months. But the truth is that the lifestyles we lead when it comes to work are death sentences in themselves, as we deny the truths that are at the heart of God and the Sabbath.

Can you imagine our lives if we actually lived to please God, to enjoy God? Leonard Sweet writes that “Holiness is getting better at enjoying God, and reveling in God’s pleasure.” Well, that’s really Sweet channeling Chariots of Fire, but it speaks to the sentiment that rises when we boil off the excess of what’s clung to our historical understanding of Sabbath in American Christianity. Today, hopefully we can boil the Sabbath down to the bare bones, and suck out the juice, the soul, the beauty of what’s left behind.

How many people are tired? How many people are anxious? Stressed? Emotionally drained?

What do we need rest from?

Psalm 55:22 says “Cast your cares on the LORD and he will sustain you; he will never let the righteous be shaken.” We shouldn’t be emotionally drained because we shouldn’t be counting on our own selves for everything we need. It’s unsustainable.

Seriously, you show me someone who doesn’t need anyone, and I’ll show you someone who’s delusional or headed for a breakdown. You show me someone who says they can get by without God, and I’ll ask what’s the toughest thing they’ve ever faced.

The Sabbath is the answer to the question, “How do we know God and come to relationship with him?”

It’s better than a three-step program. It’s a lifestyle. It’s deep and wide, and so layered that we’ve tried to make it be an hour a week, when God wants us to understand so much more.

The Sabbath recognizes God’s creative identity and redemptive history.

The Sabbath is about worship. We’re supposed to gather to thank God, to learn more about God, to be a community.

The Sabbath is about more than worship. It’s not just about going to work or not going to work. It’s also about our recognition of the welfare of our neighbor, about our lowest caste within our society. The Sabbath is about the good of ALL. The Sabbath sets us up to live in community, to not make an idol of work, and to remember that we were once slaves (the Israelites to Egypt; those post-Jesus to sin).

The Sabbath is about our good. See, there’s another Jesus reference to Sabbath. In Mark 2:27, he says, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” God knows we need a break. God knows that while electricity and alarm clocks and technology have made us ‘more productive,’ they haven’t necessarily made us better people. We need a break. We need rest, we need reflection, we need community.

The Sabbath is about making the kingdom of God on Earth. Remember the Year of Jubilee reference that Jesus read from Isaiah? It was a time that occurred when debts were forgiven and restored their previous owners, when the ground was allowed to lie fallow, so that it would be rejuvenated. The Greek is aphesis, the forgiveness of debts, of sin, of guilt. It’s about taking the rules and saying, ‘yes, they’re important, but grace, grace is more important.’

So, great, thanks, Preacher. You’ve stressed how important Sabbath is, but how do I cut back on my work hours? How do I get to a point where I can feel Sabbath?

It seems like to embrace Sabbath, to feel it, we have to practice it first. To practice it, we need to differentiate the difference.

-Take an hour this week, and turn off your phone, unplug your computer. Be unencumbered by the people and places that make you toil. Sean Gladding highlights that you might work in your garden, or on that woodworking project, or on making dinner that will bless your family, but that’s different from toil.

-Stop multitasking. This is a hard one for me, but be fully present and fully engaged in what you’re doing. Play, says the old FCA mantra, for an Audience of One. Put to death the White Rabbit in your head that tells you that you are constantly late, with no time to stop and talk, or love, or enjoy, or minister. The world tells us that the busier we are, the better we are. If that’s true, than this is oxymoronic. That makes sense because Jesus proves to be constantly oxymoronic: he won by losing. Rather than taking up arms or performing violent miracles, he seemed to let death win, before rising triumphant.

-We need to recognize our own personalities. We sometimes talk about, okay, joke about, who is a “Mary” and who is a “Martha” from Luke 10:38-42. There’s the story of these two friends of Jesus, one who sat at Jesus’ feet and soaked up his knowledge while her sister worked to put together the meal for Jesus and his disciples. Martha complains, “Lord, doesn’t it seem unfair to you that my sister just sits here while I do all the work? Tell her to come and help me.” Jesus rebuts her with, “My dear Martha, you are worried and upset over all these details! There is only one thing worth being concerned about. Mary has discovered it, and it will not be taken away from her.” The truth is that our families, our churches, and our communities wouldn’t survive without a healthy blend of both.

-Stop thinking the world revolves around you. You’ve heard the saying that “if you don’t do that, the world won’t stop revolving,” right? The truth is that we need downtime, refresher time, reboot time. From technology, from our careers, from our labor, from each other. But to take those breaks, to trust that our relationships, our responsibilities, and our checkbooks will all survive requires us to recognize that God has this covered and has promised to provide what we need. Sweet says we must learn how to stop gauging our lives by how hard we worked, or how efficiently we balanced all of our responsibilities. Instead, he says, we must play hard, enjoying life in a way that pleases God rather than appeasing our expectations for productivity.

-Learn to wait. In John 15:4-5, Jesus says, “I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.” Jesus got up early and prayed; he went away by himself to be refilled after all of the hours he spent healing and preaching. We need that to be who we’re supposed to be; we need that because we bless others out of our overflow not through our leftovers.  Pope Francis put it this way: “We are impatient, anxious to see the whole picture, but God lets us see things slowly, quietly. The Church [has] to learn how to wait.”

-Create economically and emotionally Sabbath-filled community. Jean Vanier of L’Arche: “In the midst of all the violence and corruption of the world God invites us today to create new places of belonging, places of sharing, of peace and of kindness, places where no-one needs to defend himself or herself; places where each one is loved and accepted with one’s own fragility, abilities, and disabilities. this is my vision for our churches: that they become places of belonging, places of sharing.” We need to recognize that Sabbath lifestyle means changing our spending habits, our generosity, our understanding of being missional in how we treat people.

One of my favorite stories of late comes from United Methodist pastor Phil Kenneson, whose church discovered one Christmas Eve that the building across the street was burning. A ten-story apartment building, the church had for years gone about its business without thinking much of those people or what went on there. But that Christmas Eve changed everything. Worship hymns and candle lighting stopped, and the church became the central hub of the rescue efforts by firefighters, EMTs, police, and others. The displaced found a resting place there; the dead were mourned there. The church had stopped doing church and instead, become church. It changed the way the church looked at those who lived near them, and the whole neighborhood. That night, they didn’t let the narrow definition of Sabbath as worship stop them from practicing Sabbath as a community.

I believe that we will get Sabbath when we recognize that God wants us to enjoy life, not in a claiming whatever we want and expecting that we will automatically get it, but in recognizing that God will provide us with what we need and that we have enough. When we get there, we’ll see a glimpse of heaven, not the get-out-of-hell kind or the boring-church-choir-kind that terrifies many of us, and sounds boring and oldfashioned.

See that’s the thing: Sabbath prepares us for heaven.

I believe in a heaven where God is central and provides everything. I believe Bono will be leading the choir, that sinners the likes of Shoeless Joe Jackson will come out of the cornfield to get in the ballgame. I believe that if we really understood Sabbath, and heaven, we would recognize that God wants us to take joy, to embrace the game, to measure our lives by the way they are played.

This flies in the face of what we’ve been told most of our lives… no less by church. Some of you have watched AMC’s Walking Dead but many more have experienced those people who lived for eighty years but died forty years ago. Even worse, you know zombie Christians who are too tired or too busy or too emotionally worn out to be good for anyone. I urge you to examine your own life and consider where the “fat” is, what needs cut out so that you can live fuller deeper, more ‘play-filled’ lives.

I hope today that you will stop and just breathe. I hope that you will expel the carbon dioxide that fills up in your lungs, the stuff that you’ve been carrying that you don’t need to, and breathe it out.

Breathe in God.

Take a walk, read a book, stop and talk to your neighbor. Play with your dog, teach your child something, enjoy the laughter of a good story told well. But PLAY!

Not when you retire, or you make X amount of money, but right now.

In Sabbath, we stop, we let the movement, the energy, die. It seems that we would take more work to start again, but in truth, if we don’t stop, if we don’t reflect, if we don’t recognize God’s movement in our lives, if we don’t PLAY, we die a little bit ourselves.

What could we handle if we were rested? at peace? calm? What would God show you that he has in mind for you to do if you were quiet enough to listen, if you filled your mind and heart with things that mattered?

Take a Sabbath. For an hour. For a day. For a vacation.

You may just recognize that it’s a whole new ballgame.

Posted in Books, Current Events, Pop Culture, Sermons, Theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Marcus Borg’s Convictions: Essays From A Christian Elder (Book Review)

Marcus Borg, author of The Heart of Christianity, delivers a look at his own life and an older, wiser look at faith in his seventies via Convictions: How I Learned What Matters Most. Sharing from his own experiences and offering an overview of various theological and social issues from war to Biblical interpretation, Borg echoes many of the broader images that Adam Hamilton recently tackled in Making Sense of the Bible  (out now, and also from HarperOne). He’s a deep thinker with a broader scope of understanding the words contained in the Bible, and a wider net is cast in examining the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament.

Again, Borg challenges the reader to think historically, contextually, about the Scripture, not abolishing what they might think but pushing (for some, it will be dangerously) against popular Christian understandings that may or may not be Biblical. [My own favorite example concerns the Wise Men: how many were there? when did they arrive? were they men? We Three Kings” seems to drive the bus of popular opinion.]

Issues that Borg aims at here over a series of essays:

1. Christians and the afterlife: Jesus was more concerned, says Borg, with the kingdom of God than “getting into heaven.”

2. It isn’t all factual, but that doesn’t matter: Whether you’re talking creation narratives or post-resurrection sightings, Borg isn’t bothered if you want to explain it one way or another, as long as you don’t close your mind to the big, parabolic [lesson-infleneced] meaning of the stories.

3. Jesus’ death matters, but maybe not how you think: we should be careful, he says, how we explain the death of Jesus to not paint God into a corner.

4. The Bible is more political than you think, but not what you’re expecting: read the book of Amos, or consider the Year of Jubilee.

5. Wars are fought for the wrong reasons: pacifism might deserve another look.

Overall, the book pushes your buttons and makes it interesting. You should read it, even if you don’t agree, because it will stretch your mind.

Posted in Books, Reviews | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment